Lewisham Council will go ahead with a decision to sell off land formerly used by a children’s charity despite calls to reverse it.   

Wide Horizons was an adventure learning charity formed in 2004 through a joint initiative between Lewisham and Greenwich councils.   

But the charity, which managed eight outdoor centres and provided adventure activities to nearly 47,000 children, was forced to close in 2018 over a lack of funding.  

Lewisham owns three of the centres – one in Dartford and two in Wales – but agreed to sell off the land in January.   

The decision was criticised by the council’s overview and scrutiny business panel, who said the sales would be “detrimental” to future generations and called on the council to reverse it.  

The call-in, debated at mayor and cabinet on March 11, was rejected.  

Councillor Luke Sorba, children and young people select committee chair, and Councillor Liam Curran, sustainable development scrutiny committee chair, asked that the decision be delayed until more research was done on the potential for the land. 

Cllr Curran said the decision was “essentially privatising school playing fields”.  

“The report says it does not appear to have created challenges for Lewisham schools in providing alternatives, but is that a strong enough evidence base we’re going to make a decision on? 

“I can give you evidence as a scout leader for 15 years taking children to fields, open spaces, mountains, rivers – the introduction of children to nature has profoundly beneficial effects on their development and we agreed that we think there are several things that could be done here,” he said. 

He urged mayor and cabinet not to rush into the decision. 

Councillor Sorba said the land had the specific purpose to provide “rare experiences for the most deprived children and young people in Lewisham to get out of the city and into the countryside”.  

He said scrutiny members, although they appreciated its value, did not feel Beckenham Place Park presented an “alternative”.  

“While we really appreciate the need to generate income to make all of our assets value for money, the [benefits of the] cash that will be raised can often be short-lived whereas land is a rare asset that persists and we felt that more consideration should be given to seeing these three pieces of land as an investment for the future,” he added. 

Cllr Sorba urged the mayor and cabinet to defer the decision and explore “what the long-term value of maintaining the freehold” would be. 

Speaking at the meeting, council officer Paul Moore said the rental potential from the sites was “relatively low”.  

He told mayor and cabinet: “We’re talking in the order of about £15,000 across the three sites. 

“The three buildings are, I wouldn’t say dilapidated, but […] ageing and they need investment. 

“None of them are considered to have substantial rental investment – indeed the agent’s report points to a degree of risk in securing those rentals.” 

Cabinet member for school performance and children’s services, Cllr Chris Barnham, said he was “clear” that it wasn’t an educational issue.  

“The evidence seems very strong that our schools have no problems in what seems to be a flourishing market in finding venues for outdoor education. 

“I would be concerned if there were signs that they didn’t,” he said.  

The council is obliged to take the highest bid for the land sales, raising concerns about private companies having the upper hand over the state.  

Mayor Damien Egan asked that the council starts engaging with potential buyers within the public sector, like councils, to try to ensure the land goes to the state over the private sector.