Send your news, photos & videos. Text NEWS SHOPPER and your message to 80360 or click here to email us » »
|
2:16pm Friday 16th May 2008
Comments (108) Have your say »
A 21-YEAR-OLD man from Bexleyheath has been sentenced to 10 years in jail for drugs and firearms offences.
Joseph Ryan pleaded guilty yesterday (May 15) to possessing with intent to supply cocaine, ecstasy and cannabis estimated to be worth more than £750,000.
Ryan, of Canberra Road, Bexleyheath, also pleaded guilty to possessing a pistol, a handgun, ammunition for both weapons and CS spray.
Maidstone Crown Court heard that Ryan was arrested on suspicion of supplying a controlled drug last October.
Police searched his home and vehicle and recovered a total of four-and-a-half kilos of cocaine, 15 kilos of skunk cannabis and 76 ecstasy tablets.
Police also found a "substantial" amount of cash.
Offficers then searched a flat in Thamesmead which Ryan was known to use.
In a safe police found two loaded handguns, 136 rounds of ammunition and five cans of CS spray along with two plastic containers of ecstasy tablets.
Pink Kitten, London says...
3:14pm Fri 16 May 08
Pink Kitten, London says...
3:30pm Fri 16 May 08
llb, Bexleyheath says...
3:42pm Fri 16 May 08
mt, says...
3:45pm Fri 16 May 08
Lizzielooloo, says...
4:17pm Fri 16 May 08
GEMMA, Belvedere says...
4:19pm Fri 16 May 08
llb wrote:He 'pleaded guilty to possessing a pistol, a handgun, ammunition for both weapons and CS spray'
Ok a serious crime has been commited but the people who have bad to say dont know joe, and being a good friend of his my thoughts go out to him and his family as 10 years is a long time and im sure he regrets what he has done. My thoughts are with you babe xxx
anita, dartford says...
4:29pm Fri 16 May 08
justice, outthere says...
5:12pm Fri 16 May 08
Sad to be British, says...
5:23pm Fri 16 May 08
sammy jo, says...
7:27pm Fri 16 May 08
sammy jo, says...
7:37pm Fri 16 May 08
sammy jo, says...
7:57pm Fri 16 May 08
PinkyandPerky, Erith says...
8:09pm Fri 16 May 08
sammy jo, says...
8:17pm Fri 16 May 08
Will, Bexleyheath says...
8:29pm Fri 16 May 08
sammy jo wrote:I'm glad to hear that he's already done time - means that he won't get out in 5.
you obvouisly dont n o joe because he has served already 8 months and nothin of the sort has happend you have been watching to many films.so manybe you need a sell next to him serving a perversion sentence.
sammy jo, says...
8:32pm Fri 16 May 08
Will wrote:what doed that message mean
sammy jo wrote: you obvouisly dont n o joe because he has served already 8 months and nothin of the sort has happend you have been watching to many films.so manybe you need a sell next to him serving a perversion sentence.I'm glad to hear that he's already done time - means that he won't get out in 5.
sammy jo, says...
8:34pm Fri 16 May 08
sammy jo, says...
8:37pm Fri 16 May 08
Albert, crayford says...
8:39pm Fri 16 May 08
sammy jo, says...
8:41pm Fri 16 May 08
leigh, bexleyheath says...
8:42pm Fri 16 May 08
sammy jo wrote:Will What makes u think he wont be out in 5, were u in the court room?? Dont think!! get yer facts rite!!!
Will wrote:what doed that message meansammy jo wrote: you obvouisly dont n o joe because he has served already 8 months and nothin of the sort has happend you have been watching to many films.so manybe you need a sell next to him serving a perversion sentence.I\\\'m glad to hear that he\\\'s already done time - means that he won\\\'t get out in 5.
aimee, dartford says...
8:52pm Fri 16 May 08
pc, says...
11:27pm Fri 16 May 08
lj, here says...
11:38pm Fri 16 May 08
sisyphus, Bromley says...
11:49pm Fri 16 May 08
Joes Mum, Erith says...
12:30am Sat 17 May 08
patriche, BEXLEY says...
5:43am Sat 17 May 08
Mark, Dartford says...
10:08am Sat 17 May 08
M, Eltham says...
10:44am Sat 17 May 08
Me, Here says...
11:37am Sat 17 May 08
Joes Mum, Erith says...
12:01pm Sat 17 May 08
llb, bexleyheath says...
1:05pm Sat 17 May 08
llb, bexleyheath says...
1:26pm Sat 17 May 08
curious, London says...
1:50pm Sat 17 May 08
Lll, says...
1:56pm Sat 17 May 08
curious wrote:Yeah but Curious, apparently he has got "an 'eart of gold"
\"Police searched his home and vehicle and recovered a total of four-and-a-half kilos of cocaine, 15 kilos of skunk cannabis and 76 ecstasy tablets. \"Officers then searched a flat in Thamesmead which Ryan was known to use. \"In a safe police found two loaded handguns, 136 rounds of ammunition and five cans of CS spray along with two plastic containers of ecstasy tablets.\" Pillar of the community!
unnamed, kent says...
3:53pm Sat 17 May 08
tasha, bromley says...
4:16pm Sat 17 May 08
Jay, London says...
6:00pm Sat 17 May 08
Joes Mum, Erith says...
6:54pm Sat 17 May 08
Joes Mum, Erith says...
7:47pm Sat 17 May 08
Sisyphus, Bromley says...
8:32pm Sat 17 May 08
Matt, bromley says...
8:33pm Sat 17 May 08
Jay, London says...
9:05pm Sat 17 May 08
Joes Mum, Erith says...
10:01pm Sat 17 May 08
TJ, around says...
5:53pm Sun 18 May 08
llb, bexleyheath says...
6:39pm Sun 18 May 08
sammy jo, says...
7:58pm Sun 18 May 08
llb wrote:just wounder if aimee sister would no this llb
Yer well i dont care what any of you say., joes is a good friend, and id back him up 100%, i think soo much of him and i just want him to do his time so i can see him happy again ****
Simon Bull, Web editor, News Shopper says...
10:19pm Sun 18 May 08
TJ wrote:Maybe, TJ, it was because you couldn't post a comment without using bad language. And you call me simple? Honestly ...
why has my posts been removed simple simon..
TJ, here says...
10:36pm Sun 18 May 08
vern, west wickham says...
10:36pm Sun 18 May 08
llb wrote:He looks like a lovely bloke,i expect old ladies he helps across the road will miss him...........of course he regrets....... GETTING - you sound like a tight NUMBNUT....BABE.
Ok a serious crime has been commited but the people who have bad to say dont know joe, and being a good friend of his my thoughts go out to him and his family as 10 years is a long time and im sure he regrets what he has done. My thoughts are with you babe xxx
Officer & Gentleman, London says...
10:47pm Sun 18 May 08
Joes Mum wrote:To put some clarity on this - I was on the team investigating this.As you know the guilty plea was entered because the evidence was so compelling. A " Not Guilty" Plea would have attracted a minimum term of 18 yrs. We all love our Children but we should not try to justify their actions.
Lets see if I can make it a bit clearer for all thats interested in this case, I was actually in the court room myself on this case & I personally believe that a 10 year sentence is no way long enough for someone that is TRULY 100% guilty of these offences.
Only the people in the court room can vouch for what happened, the judge & jury was actually on Joes side and knew he was not involved in the firearms or a large part of the drugs so they came to a deal where as if he went not guilty & lost in a very complex argument he could have got 20+ years so he was advised to go guilty so the judge could give him a smaller sentence for the said crimes.(that he did not commit)
Sick I know but true!
Joe DID NOT commit these crimes detailed as they are in the local news, if the reporters did their jobs properly & sat in courtroom you would be reading a very different story now.
His Girlfriend DID NOT live off of any immoral earnings, neither is she a whore.
So although he is actually guilty on paper he is not of the crimes as they are indicated.
I now have a sceptical view of the British legal system & I look at convicted prisoners
In a totally different light.
If I thought my son was guilty of these crimes I would not be sitting here defending him I would wash my hands of him.
Joe is not here to fight his corner and it looks like you have you own fight going on here anyway so I will say goodnight & leave you to it.
Joes Mum
sisyphus, Bromley says...
11:08pm Sun 18 May 08
Joes Mum wrote:He pleaded guilty, so there was no trial, i.e. no jury. So how could they have been "on his side"? Are you sure you were there?
Lets see if I can make it a bit clearer for all thats interested in this case, I was actually in the court room myself on this case & I personally believe that a 10 year sentence is no way long enough for someone that is TRULY 100% guilty of these offences.
Only the people in the court room can vouch for what happened, the judge & jury was actually on Joes side and knew he was not involved in the firearms or a large part of the drugs so they came to a deal where as if he went not guilty & lost in a very complex argument he could have got 20+ years so he was advised to go guilty so the judge could give him a smaller sentence for the said crimes.(that he did not commit)
Sick I know but true!
Joe DID NOT commit these crimes detailed as they are in the local news, if the reporters did their jobs properly & sat in courtroom you would be reading a very different story now.
His Girlfriend DID NOT live off of any immoral earnings, neither is she a whore.
So although he is actually guilty on paper he is not of the crimes as they are indicated.
I now have a sceptical view of the British legal system & I look at convicted prisoners
In a totally different light.
If I thought my son was guilty of these crimes I would not be sitting here defending him I would wash my hands of him.
Joe is not here to fight his corner and it looks like you have you own fight going on here anyway so I will say goodnight & leave you to it.
Joes Mum
Joes Mum, Erith says...
12:00am Mon 19 May 08
Officer & Gentleman, London says...
12:00am Mon 19 May 08
sisyphus wrote:As you have correctly noted The mother (if indeed it is her) is showing the motherly delusion that her criminal son is "innocent" If he is I suggest he requests a
Joes Mum wrote:He pleaded guilty, so there was no trial, i.e. no jury. So how could they have been "on his side"? Are you sure you were there?
Lets see if I can make it a bit clearer for all thats interested in this case, I was actually in the court room myself on this case & I personally believe that a 10 year sentence is no way long enough for someone that is TRULY 100% guilty of these offences.
Only the people in the court room can vouch for what happened, the judge & jury was actually on Joes side and knew he was not involved in the firearms or a large part of the drugs so they came to a deal where as if he went not guilty & lost in a very complex argument he could have got 20+ years so he was advised to go guilty so the judge could give him a smaller sentence for the said crimes.(that he did not commit)
Sick I know but true!
Joe DID NOT commit these crimes detailed as they are in the local news, if the reporters did their jobs properly & sat in courtroom you would be reading a very different story now.
His Girlfriend DID NOT live off of any immoral earnings, neither is she a whore.
So although he is actually guilty on paper he is not of the crimes as they are indicated.
I now have a sceptical view of the British legal system & I look at convicted prisoners
In a totally different light.
If I thought my son was guilty of these crimes I would not be sitting here defending him I would wash my hands of him.
Joe is not here to fight his corner and it looks like you have you own fight going on here anyway so I will say goodnight & leave you to it.
Joes Mum
patrich, bexley says...
6:25am Mon 19 May 08
Simon Bull, web editor, News Shopper says...
9:11am Mon 19 May 08
Joes Mum wrote:Sometimes people who make valid comments in a debate either refer to other peoples comments or quote what other people have written.
So Pease tell me Simon Bull Why was my post deleted I dont recall using bad language?
mt, says...
2:57pm Fri 16 May 08