Time has come to cull urban foxes: News Shopper comment (From News Shopper)
Get involved: Send pictures, video, news and views - text NEWS SHOPPER to 80360 or email us
Time has come to cull urban foxes: News Shopper comment
9:49am Wednesday 13th February 2013 in Lewisham
Should urban foxes be culled?
A HORRIFIC attack on a baby is what News Shopper warned would happen when we called for urban fox hunting 10 years ago.
Now, as one-month-old baby Denny Dolan lies recovering in hospital, we say something like this must never be allowed to happen again.
Badgers are set to be culled in two pilot areas this summer with the eventual aim of protecting cattle by wiping out bovine tuberculosis. But nothing is being proposed to stop the menace of foxes.
They have been responsible for countless incidents in the News Shopper area in recent years and after the attack on Denny we say enough is enough.
Now it is time for the foxes in our towns to be trapped and humanely killed so their existence on our streets becomes a thing of the past.
We believe urban fox hunting is the best solution to an ever more menacing problem.
After he suffered one of the country’s worst-ever fox attacks, Denny Dolan’s parents kept a constant vigil at the one-month-old’s hospital bedside.
Denny’s head was stitched and his hand bandaged after surgeons completed a lengthy operation to reattach a finger which had been reportedly bitten off by a fox.
His mother Hayley Cawley, of Dagonet Road, Downham, said she found the fox with her newborn son’s hand in its mouth after she went to investigate a noise.
What do you think about culling urban foxes? Are you in favour or against? Add your comments below and vote in our poll.
Comments(41)
PaulErith
says...
10:14am Wed 13 Feb 13
Obviously I don't believe that dogs should be culled, but just trying to get some perspective on it. Fox attacks remain extremely rare.
PaulErith
says...
10:19am Wed 13 Feb 13
Chrisbitz wrote:Great minds think alike! :)
Family Dogs are a much worse problem - They're attacking kids every week. Fox attacks are once in a blue moon. Surely you'd manufacture more controversy by calling for a cull of dogs?
joertmclark
says...
11:02am Wed 13 Feb 13
the wall
says...
11:15am Wed 13 Feb 13
Has no one at the NS listened to what any of the experts are saying?
Put your money where your mouth is NS and offer to pay for the cull. Then you will have every animal lover in this country on your door step.
This reminds me of the scene in Jaws when every man dog and monkey go out to kill the shark. The NS want their revenge and any fox will do.
Shameful!
Gypo.Joe
says...
11:29am Wed 13 Feb 13
Big buxom broad arsed ladies in jodpurs and boots on Sunday mornings galloping down Petts Wood Road.
I would deffo turn up to watch in me wax coat and green wellies.
Colin.smith
says...
11:30am Wed 13 Feb 13
joertmclark
says...
11:56am Wed 13 Feb 13
Colin.smith wrote:Do you agree with culling dogs then?
Foxes are a menace! Im all for a cull - and there will always be some hippy animal lover saying its wrong - would you think the same if a fox attacked your children ?
PaulErith
says...
11:58am Wed 13 Feb 13
Colin.smith wrote:As previously mentioned, we keep building on their natural habitat, so what do you exect. It's not a case of being a 'hippy animal lover' as you put it. It's about a bit of respect for the animal kingdom, and also recognising realistic threat before considering a cull.
Foxes are a menace! Im all for a cull - and there will always be some hippy animal lover saying its wrong - would you think the same if a fox attacked your children ?
As also mentioned, there's way more dog attacks so do you think they should also be culled? I've read about someone being killed by swans - should we kill them all off too? The "threat" from foxes is pretty much on the same level. Attacks are very rare.
Gypo.Joe
says...
12:01pm Wed 13 Feb 13
the wall
says...
12:12pm Wed 13 Feb 13
Parents have killed more children than foxes.
Lets kill everything until we feel better.
Good name for a pub The Fox and Finger.
Polly Staight
says...
12:13pm Wed 13 Feb 13
To avoid re-making the same mistakes previously observed, such as its innate exclusiveness, everyone should be encouraged to participate.
I am thinking BMX bikes and "Staffies" chasing through the alleyways and estates, as well as Clive Smithering-Smithingt
on and his pals on horseback at the Quorn.
The point of foxhunting is to keep these pesky critters under control in a humane fashion, shooting (and likely wounding) a fox is such a cruel thing to do.
bnorther
says...
12:21pm Wed 13 Feb 13
Leave them alone, and be glad we still have some wildlife to see in an otherwise sterile city.
Peony
says...
12:38pm Wed 13 Feb 13
michellecally
says...
12:51pm Wed 13 Feb 13
PaulErith
says...
1:14pm Wed 13 Feb 13
Cllr Colin Smith
says...
1:15pm Wed 13 Feb 13
Colin.smith wrote:Lest anyone cares, and without seeking a trademark on a common name, this was not my quote.
Foxes are a menace! Im all for a cull - and there will always be some hippy animal lover saying its wrong - would you think the same if a fox attacked your children ?
I only mention it now to hopefully avoid any further abusive emails !
j.j.
says...
1:22pm Wed 13 Feb 13
bnorther wrote:Contrary to what you and a lot of others (are led to) believe, these rare cases biting is not the main problem with foxes. Foxes have in their guts organisms that are very dangerous to humans and there is a health risk every time they poo in someone's garden. A child losing his or her sight or being paralysed from the waist down is a very high price to pay for the pleasure of having these furry friends in our gardens.
The vast majority of foxs are harmless. The worst they do is leave a poo somewhere in your garden and maybe pull out your bins. Big deal. Leave them alone, and be glad we still have some wildlife to see in an otherwise sterile city.
PaulErith
says...
1:38pm Wed 13 Feb 13
j.j. wrote:There are also similar dangers with dog poo. Similarly, some plants are poisionous. Maybe we should cull all animals, remove all plants, and stick our children in oxygen tanks.....or we could just use common sense and realise that actually it's very rare for people to get hurt by these things. We can protect our kids by taking reasonable precautions and common sense without over reactions.
bnorther wrote: The vast majority of foxs are harmless. The worst they do is leave a poo somewhere in your garden and maybe pull out your bins. Big deal. Leave them alone, and be glad we still have some wildlife to see in an otherwise sterile city.Contrary to what you and a lot of others (are led to) believe, these rare cases biting is not the main problem with foxes. Foxes have in their guts organisms that are very dangerous to humans and there is a health risk every time they poo in someone's garden. A child losing his or her sight or being paralysed from the waist down is a very high price to pay for the pleasure of having these furry friends in our gardens.
Eagles_Man
says...
2:49pm Wed 13 Feb 13
"Badgers are set to be culled in two pilot areas this summer with the eventual aim of protecting cattle by wiping out bovine tuberculosis."
Replace 'eventual' with 'stated'.
"They have been responsible for countless incidents in the News Shopper area in recent years and after the attack on Denny"
Insert 'allegedly' before 'responsible' and 'reported' before 'attack'.
Sorry to state the bl**ding obvious, but:
(a) we don't know if this was a fox or not.
(b) culling won't work
(c) as others have said, where does that leave dogs, abusive parents, cars, etc?
The NS really does seem to be milking this one.
the wall
says...
2:52pm Wed 13 Feb 13
PaulErith wrote:Well said Paul.
j.j. wrote:There are also similar dangers with dog poo. Similarly, some plants are poisionous. Maybe we should cull all animals, remove all plants, and stick our children in oxygen tanks.....or we could just use common sense and realise that actually it's very rare for people to get hurt by these things. We can protect our kids by taking reasonable precautions and common sense without over reactions.
bnorther wrote: The vast majority of foxs are harmless. The worst they do is leave a poo somewhere in your garden and maybe pull out your bins. Big deal. Leave them alone, and be glad we still have some wildlife to see in an otherwise sterile city.Contrary to what you and a lot of others (are led to) believe, these rare cases biting is not the main problem with foxes. Foxes have in their guts organisms that are very dangerous to humans and there is a health risk every time they poo in someone's garden. A child losing his or her sight or being paralysed from the waist down is a very high price to pay for the pleasure of having these furry friends in our gardens.
Daffodils will kill a small child
(it has the poison lycorine,, mostly in the bulb but also in the leaves) These are all over parks.
Lets kill Daffodils!
bnorther
says...
3:15pm Wed 13 Feb 13
Culls have been show to *INCREASE* bovine TB. This is mainly due to the fact that badgers stay pretty much in their own area. When there are culls, either the remaining badgers run away in fear or their "patch" increases due to less badgers being around.
So unless you cull every Badger, bTB will increase. Source:http://www3.i
mperial.ac.uk/newsan
deventspggrp/imperia
lcollege/newssummary
/news_13-7-2011-9-59
-29?newsid=100586
Also - remember bTB came originally from cattle, and gave it to the Badgers, not the other way around. It's farming, and the movement of catlle all around the country that is to blame for bTB, not the Badgers.
This current government is set on re-introducing fox hunting & Badger culling. The current intervention by Bromley Council, running around radio stations and papers, when this alleged attack took place in Lewisham is a shameful hijack of this story for political gain.
Why is Councillor Tim Stevens speaking to the press about something that has nothing to do with him?
the wall
says...
3:34pm Wed 13 Feb 13
Well said bnorther, I was going to say about the bTB but I was keeping some powder dry.
polan123
says...
3:42pm Wed 13 Feb 13
nearly right all the time
says...
4:52pm Wed 13 Feb 13
it would be spread by the Fox population..
Trap them, kill them (humanly)
Keep the numbers down, or we might
just with a disaster on our hands
And for god sake dont feed them!
the wall
says...
5:03pm Wed 13 Feb 13
Just don't feed them is the only good you said in that comment.
the wall
says...
5:04pm Wed 13 Feb 13
nearly right all the time
says...
5:53pm Wed 13 Feb 13
tool!
See the excellent CDC web site.
Rememember `bird flu" what was the
lead time for the vacine 6-9months?
Also a little knowledge is dangerous!
PS Stay off WiKKi its track record is not very good
patwoodhouse
says...
9:08pm Wed 13 Feb 13
There are thousands upon thousands of urban foxes in our neighbourhoods, so a cull would be impossible. People simply have to take responsibility. Don't feed them for a start. Make sure any open windows are inaccessible to wildlife. Contain your rubbish, making additional trips to your local recycling centre if you have to rather than leaving it to fester on your property. I keep chickens which I free range in my garden during the day and in two years, I have yet to lose one to a fox.
lemongrass
says...
10:10pm Wed 13 Feb 13
I suggest you do a spot of responsible research before you cast foxes as murderous vermin, inciting the yobs of this borough to 'hunt them down.'
Irresponsible dog owners are the real menace to the well being of us all in today's society. Irresponsible dog owners who care nothing for the safety of young children and babies as most of them are iresponsible parents of young children too.
The A&E departments of Bromley hospitals, indeed hospitals across the country, are not filled with 4 week old babies that have been attacked by foxes, but by children torn to shreds within an inch of their lives by out of control family pets. I doubt if you would find one case of an injury from a fox.
This story would never have had the media coverage that it has been given if this attack had not been extremely rare. Hence the shock, horror that a normally respectful and entirely peaceable fox should resort to grabbing a small baby. No one would raise an eyebrow if it had been the family pet.
mainman
says...
11:45pm Wed 13 Feb 13
lemongrass wrote:Well said. I think we have a countryside alliance member within the ns
I am inclined to think that you dear editor of the Bromley Newshopper should be hunted down for your totally irresponsible front page reporting of the supposed menace from foxes. I suggest you do a spot of responsible research before you cast foxes as murderous vermin, inciting the yobs of this borough to 'hunt them down.' Irresponsible dog owners are the real menace to the well being of us all in today's society. Irresponsible dog owners who care nothing for the safety of young children and babies as most of them are iresponsible parents of young children too. The A&E departments of Bromley hospitals, indeed hospitals across the country, are not filled with 4 week old babies that have been attacked by foxes, but by children torn to shreds within an inch of their lives by out of control family pets. I doubt if you would find one case of an injury from a fox. This story would never have had the media coverage that it has been given if this attack had not been extremely rare. Hence the shock, horror that a normally respectful and entirely peaceable fox should resort to grabbing a small baby. No one would raise an eyebrow if it had been the family pet.
.
Oldchap
says...
7:00am Thu 14 Feb 13
Polly Staight wrote:So chasing a fox for miles then having it torn apart by dogs is humane?
I would like to encourage a re-introduction of fox-hunting in the UK.
To avoid re-making the same mistakes previously observed, such as its innate exclusiveness, everyone should be encouraged to participate.
I am thinking BMX bikes and "Staffies" chasing through the alleyways and estates, as well as Clive Smithering-Smithingt
on and his pals on horseback at the Quorn.
The point of foxhunting is to keep these pesky critters under control in a humane fashion, shooting (and likely wounding) a fox is such a cruel thing to do.
Tip-Top
says...
8:14am Thu 14 Feb 13
;o)
Bestbaz
says...
8:46am Thu 14 Feb 13
Gypo.Joe
says...
10:51am Thu 14 Feb 13
Tip-Top wrote:Mr T you are of course right, today is the day to mend my wicked ways. ;)
There’s far too much indirect flirting going on here…….Lady28 & Joe…..if there’s one day to make an appropriate reconciliation, then today is the day
;o)
Now just for this one special day I'm going to send out this tune for Lou. ( Lady28 ) YouTube this Lou.
Fedde Le Grand - So Much Love (Official Music Video)
All my Love Joe xx
Tomorrow is another day though. :)
the wall
says...
11:09am Thu 14 Feb 13
Gypo.Joe wrote:That's so swwwweeeeeet!
Tip-Top wrote:Mr T you are of course right, today is the day to mend my wicked ways. ;)
There’s far too much indirect flirting going on here…….Lady28 & Joe…..if there’s one day to make an appropriate reconciliation, then today is the day
;o)
Now just for this one special day I'm going to send out this tune for Lou. ( Lady28 ) YouTube this Lou.
Fedde Le Grand - So Much Love (Official Music Video)
All my Love Joe xx
Tomorrow is another day though. :)
I was there, you can see me jumping up and down.
Inspirationalady28
says...
11:13am Thu 14 Feb 13
Oldchap
says...
3:01pm Thu 14 Feb 13
PaulErith wrote:Boom boom
If there is a cull, can we at least have a campaign to save Basil Brush - He was one of my favourites growing up!
Colin.smith
says...
10:34am Fri 15 Feb 13
Wiggy001
says...
11:56am Mon 18 Feb 13
It is a fact that fox numbers multiply to the maximum level that an area can sustain, so the more food there is the more foxes will breed and the larger the surviving litters will be. Therefore, culling foxes will just result in those let breeding faster to fill the "vacuum".
Why do people think a cull is the answer, but not acknowledge that removing their easy source of food would be far more beneficial, cheaper and have the knock-on effect of reducing the number of other vermin such as rats?
It really isn't rocket science.
Inspirationalady28
says...
2:59pm Mon 18 Feb 13
Wiggy001 wrote:So I say to all the Downham folk..“Go out and clear up your own back yard and never point a finger at someone before checking yours is clean!”
If there were no food in towns and cities for foxes, do you think they would stay? Of course not. They are only so prevalent in urban areas because people provide them with an easy source of food.
It is a fact that fox numbers multiply to the maximum level that an area can sustain, so the more food there is the more foxes will breed and the larger the surviving litters will be. Therefore, culling foxes will just result in those let breeding faster to fill the "vacuum".
Why do people think a cull is the answer, but not acknowledge that removing their easy source of food would be far more beneficial, cheaper and have the knock-on effect of reducing the number of other vermin such as rats?
It really isn't rocket science.
Chrisbitz says...
10:14am Wed 13 Feb 13
Surely you'd manufacture more controversy by calling for a cull of dogs?