Home page
Top Stories
National News
National Video News
Send News, Pictures and Videos
Video News
Lewisham and Greenwich
Bexley
Bromley
Dartford and Gravesend
Swap Shopper
Our Young Stars
Retro
Features
Newsroom Blog
Condolence
Picture Galleries
Photo Sales
Campaigns
Our Reporters
Youth
Transport
Health
News
Chemists
Weather
Beat the Crunch
Site Map
Search Advanced Search
News  RSS Feed RSS feed | About
EDITOR'S CHOICE
SWAP SHOPPER
Swap Shopper: Meet Spandau Ballet star
Next swap has huge funtential
YOUR SPACE
Album review - Diva
Theatre review - Jersey Boys
RETRO
Councillor rap and world of stamps
Wizard conjures up magical memories
OUR YOUNG STARS
Chance to reward Our Young Stars
GET OUR NEWS BY E-MAIL
Most read Comments
Hospital set to lose A&E
Queen Mary's Hospital will lose its emergency services
Queen Mary's Hospital will lose its emergency services

There has been mixed reactions to news Queen Mary's Hospital, Sidcup, will become a borough hospital under plans to reorganise health services in outer south-east London.

While residents have reacted with anger and disappointment to the decision by a joint committee of the primary care trusts for the four boroughs involved, Queen Mary's is talking up the new opportunities ahead.

At its meeting in London, the joint committee covering Bexley, Bromley, Greenwich and Lewisham, opted for a modified version of option two, one of three options offered to the public for consultation.

This will see the Princess Royal in Farnborough and the Queen Elizabeth in Woolwich become the major acute hospitals for the area.

Both hospitals will also keep their 23-hour day surgery, but lose their planned surgery units.

Lewisham Hospital will keep all its emergency services, including maternity and in-patient paediatrics.

But its surgical A&E service will be limited to 8am to 8pm.

Lewisham will also keep its day surgery and become a centre for planned surgery.

Kate Grimes
Kate Grimes

For Queen Mary's there was only ever one option on the table - to be stripped of its emergency services and become a borough hospital.

It was a point raised by Bexley councillor Don Massey at Monday's meeting.

He told the meeting the consultation process "stinks of discrimination".

He added: "There was no realistic option for Queen Mary's in this analysis."

"I know what people think and they believe the process was flawed. It looks wrong."

This was echoed by a member of Bexley Pensioners' Forum who said: "People in Bexley had only one option and most voted against it.

"We were stitched up, and we know it."

Michael Chuter, joint committee chairman, said the whole process had started from the fact none of the hospitals met the minimum clinical guidelines for all their services and would never be able to do so if they remained the same.

Under the agreed proposals, Queen Mary's will become the second centre for planned surgery, also taking all the patients from the existing planned surgery unit at Orpington Hospital, which will close.

It will have a 24-hour urgent care centre; 23-hour day surgery; community, diagnostic and specialist walk-in care such as renal dialysis, cardiology, neurology and cancer care; outpatient services; intermediate in-patient care and rehabilitation including beds and services.

Queen Mary's chief executive Kate Grimes, who was at the London meeting, said: "I know many people will see this as sad news for the hospital, but we believe this decision gives us a great opportunity to be the leading hospital providing planned surgery for around a million people across south-east London."

She said the changes being made in south-east London could become the template for the NHS.

And she explained in the past, hospitals had been seen as in competition for patients, adding they would now work closely together to provide coordinated services for local people.

Others take a less optimistic view and tomorrow the joint overview and scrutiny committee, made up of councillors from the four boroughs, plus representatives from Lambeth, Southwark and Kent County Council, meet at Bexley's civic offices at 7.30pm, to decide their reaction to Monday's decision.

  • For more details on the implications of the proposals and reaction, see the special report in next week's News Shopper.

    4:10pm Tuesday 22nd July 2008


    Michael Chuter
      

    Print   Email this   Comment
    Posted by: JJ, Welling on 4:47pm Tue 22 Jul 08
    Come on Mr Dawber, whats New Labour spin on this then.

    Here's a frssh page for you to tell us how our Emergency Treatment is going to be 'better' with us loosing our A&E.
    Posted by: Jack G, bromley on 11:18am Wed 23 Jul 08
    & it won't stop there with A&E.
    I understand the same committee have decided to put pathology services out to tender. I guess they have been inspired by how much cleaner hospitals are these days with private cleaning companies (please excuse me for using the lowest form of wit).
    Add your comment
    Name:
    Email: *
    Location:
    **
    Security Image. Registered site users are not required to enter Security Image Information.
     
     e.g. 123-123
    Comment:
    Please note: All HTML tags will be ignored.
    Format Text:

     
    By posting a comment, I confirm that I have read and agree to the terms of use. Comments are not moderated but we will react if anything that breaks the rules comes to our attention and we may delete inappropriate postings. Please treat other people with respect. You must not post anything that is abusive, indecent, unlawful or defamatory. Remember, you are personally liable for what you post on this site. If you wish to complain about a comment, contact us here.
    * Your email address will not be displayed
    ** To avoid register now or login
    Archive
  • '
    Click here to read your local newspaper online

    Click here for Bexley College prospectus


    CLICK HERE FOR THE LATEST NEWS ON GREEN GUARDIAN

    See our Bite restaurants guide
    Order your photographs online...
    Local info
    Latest traffic updates, school league tables, your nearest doctors, crime figures and more
    Terms & Conditions
    Privacy Policy © Copyright 2001-2008
    Newsquest Media Group
    A Gannett Company
    This site is part of Newsquest's audited local newspaper network