Tougher sentences for people convicted of dangerous dog offences

Tougher sentences for people convicted of dangerous dog offences Tougher sentences for people convicted of dangerous dog offences

TOUGHER sentences will be handed to people who are convicted of dangerous dog offences under new guidelines from the Sentencing Council.

The guideline covers the most commonly sentenced offences in the Dangerous Dogs Act 1991 including allowing a dog to be dangerously out of control causing injury and possession of a prohibited dog.

More than 500 people responded to a public consultation about how owners of dangerous dogs should be sentenced.

The new guideline will mean more offenders will face jail sentences, more will get community orders and fewer will receive discharges.

Owners who allow their dog to be dangerously out of control injuring someone could be jailed for 18 months.

While people in possession of a prohibited dog could face up to six months in prison.

In situations where someone deliberately sets a dog on another person intending to injure them, the offender is likely to be charged with assault, rather than one of these offences.

The guideline has also been extended to include injuries to other animals as an aggravating factor in the offence of allowing a dog to be out of control and causing injury.

District judge and member of the Sentencing Council, Anne Arnold, said: "Most dog owners are responsible and take good care of their pets, but we’ve seen more and more cases coming before the courts of owners who have put the public at risk or let their dog cause injuries - sometimes very serious - to people.

"As a result, this new sentencing guideline encourages courts to use their full powers when dealing with offenders so that they are jailed where appropriate.

"It also gives guidance to courts on making the best use of their powers so that people can be banned from keeping dogs, genuinely dangerous dogs can be put down and compensation can be paid to victims."

A spokesman for the Mayor of London said: “These welcome changes mean we’re one step closer to tackling the serious menace of weapon dogs, but I’ll continue lobbying for the wider legislation to ensure the owners who deliberately train animals to become weapons dogs receive the same harsh punishment as people who carry knives.”

The new guideline will be used in courts from August 20.

What News Shopper wants

- Increase the sentence for owning a banned dog - in line with carrying a knife.

- Extend the law to include dog attacks on private land - therefore protecting workers such as postmen and carers.

- Increase the prison sentences for owners convicted of allowing their dog to attack humans.

- Force all Staffordshire Bull Terriers to wear a muzzle in public.

- Simplify the court process so that banned dogs can be destroyed immediately.

Comments(10)

Inspirationalady28 says...
11:26am Tue 15 May 12

News Shopper wants ALL Staffs to be muzzled in public...why Staffs? There are other dangerous dogs out there who should be muzzled!!

concerned.erith says...
11:37am Tue 15 May 12

Personally all dogs should be muzzled when they are outside and near inocent members of the public. That way no chance of getting bitten!

Inspirationalady28 says...
12:05pm Tue 15 May 12

If all dogs have to be muzzled in public places then what will become of Crufts and police dogs and sniffer dogs (Spaniels)?? They're in public places!!!!!

the wall says...
12:16pm Tue 15 May 12

concerned.erith wrote:
Personally all dogs should be muzzled when they are outside and near inocent members of the public. That way no chance of getting bitten!
Most humans should be muzzled. Starting with you.

PaulErith says...
1:16pm Tue 15 May 12

concerned.erith wrote:
Personally all dogs should be muzzled when they are outside and near inocent members of the public. That way no chance of getting bitten!
Totall agree. There should also be tougher sentencing for failing to clean up after one's dog too. It's totally immoral.

jsmith1457 says...
2:24pm Tue 15 May 12

What the newshopper wants... are unrealistic expectations which would not resolve the issue of dangerous dogs (dangerous sdogs are not just staffordshire bull terriers!!)

What newshopper readers want is a newspaper that is capable of a decent report and some common sense, which seems to be lacking.

longshanks2 says...
8:56am Wed 16 May 12

I know quite a few people who own staffs, never had a problem with them, while in street have been bitten twice by unknown staffs with there owners, i think its the owners who need to look after there dogs properly,

miss rumble tumble says...
9:46am Wed 16 May 12

the wall wrote:
concerned.erith wrote: Personally all dogs should be muzzled when they are outside and near inocent members of the public. That way no chance of getting bitten!
Most humans should be muzzled. Starting with you.
take a day off wall you are embarrassing your self yet again! lol

justjackuk says...
2:21pm Wed 16 May 12

Why should all dogs be muzzled? .. how about all children should be on rains.. regardless of age or "if they are good" .. .. people should take note its not the staffie's fault, its not even the dogs fault.. its the owner!! .. if the NS wants to do something productive rather then gagging the nanny's dog then campaign for all owners to have a dog license.. this will create jobs, solve some ASBO orders and abuse on animals! ... we have them in NI, and other countries.. I am not saying they will solve all our issues, but I reckon it will be a good step towards the right direction.

the wall says...
3:40pm Wed 16 May 12

To all those that want dogs muzzled - Can you tell me how dogs regulate their body temperature?

Yes that's right through panting.

So how will a dog do this with a muzzle on? How will the dog drink water with a mussle on ?

click2find

About cookies

We want you to enjoy your visit to our website. That's why we use cookies to enhance your experience. By staying on our website you agree to our use of cookies. Find out more about the cookies we use.

I agree