Chislehurst Road bridge graffiti - art or vandalism? Editor's Eye comment (From News Shopper)
Get involved: Send pictures, video, news and views - text NEWS SHOPPER to 80360 or email us
Chislehurst Road bridge graffiti - art or vandalism? Editor's Eye comment
1:43pm Monday 19th November 2012 in Bromley By Andrew Parkes, News Shopper editor
One of the bits of graffiti daubed on the recently reopened Chislehurst Road bridge
GRAFFITI – a foul scourge on society or a modern expressive art form?
We’ve been waiting a year for the Chislehurst Road bridge to reopen, and the ribbon was finally cut last Friday. But, within hours, someone has scrawled graffiti right across the brand new, shiny surface.
So, should we celebrate the wit required to come up with: “Don’t jump, life is so amazing”, or do we call for the immediate re-introduction of birching for anyone caught in the act?
You could argue that at least this comment has a relevance to the site where it has been scrawled. You could even make the case it is upbeat. Mind you, alongside this carefully scripted witticism was a far more mundane, and universal, graffiti offering — a crudely drawn penis.
So, should humour and artistic ability be celebrated, whilst those without talent, who tend to fall back upon obscenity, be roundly punished?
I strongly suspect there’s very little point even pondering the question as the chance of actually catching the nasty little scumbags is negligible.
And, if there is any inconsistency regarding graffiti ‘artists’ we’ve only got ourselves to blame. As soon as anyone labelled this criminal behaviour as an art form we were on the ugly, defaced road to ruin.
Even the authorities approach the problem in wildly different ways. Luckily responsibility for this bridge falls to Bromley Council, which has an avowed aim to remove graffiti within 24 hours of being informed about it. Network Rail’s view appears to be that, unless it’s offensive, they won’t even touch it.
Presumably if this little ‘artist’ wrote: “What a lovely looking bridge” on a new Network Rail structure it would stay for eternity.
What do you think? Is graffiti ever an art form or is it always just vandalism? How should people guilty of graffiti be punished? Who should pay for the removal of graffiti? Add your comments below.
Comments(11)
the wall
says...
2:47pm Mon 19 Nov 12
the wall
says...
2:51pm Mon 19 Nov 12
the wall wrote:Oops my mistake it on the other report of the graffiti on the same bridge.
I don't know why comment was removed?
Have your say
says...
3:00pm Mon 19 Nov 12
Lord Erastus Theobald Piggott
says...
3:44pm Mon 19 Nov 12
Have your say
says...
4:30pm Mon 19 Nov 12
madras
says...
7:22pm Mon 19 Nov 12
It's also a poor effort having bare concrete when they could have come up with something a little more sympathetic to the eye - even for a bridge
Perhaps the council could sponsor local school / college to design something?
ksc
says...
11:45am Tue 20 Nov 12
PaulErith
says...
12:45pm Tue 20 Nov 12
2bobsworth
says...
8:16pm Tue 20 Nov 12
if it was graffiti on the bridge up the top of star lane,noone would be botherd!!!!
its only because its up in petts wood that its made the newsshopper!!!
Polly Staight
says...
11:14am Wed 21 Nov 12
If the "scumbags" of which the NS speaks, whether they be a kid from the local school or the one known as "Banksy", did whatever it is they do on their own property, they could call it "Mary" if it pleased them...
...When it is on public property, it is vandalism.
Jenfleur says...
2:01pm Mon 19 Nov 12