Get involved: Send pictures, video, news and views - text NEWS SHOPPER to 80360 or email us
1:20pm Thursday 11th March 2010 in
A REPORT on who was to blame for the power cut which plunged thousands of people into darkness for up to four days, has been delayed again.
Energy watchdog Ofgem was due to make public the results of an auditor’s investigation into last July’s EDF Energy power, cut by the end of February.
It had initially promised the report in November last year.
Now it is suggesting the report will not be made public until May.
Ofgem asked for an independent auditor’s report on the incident, which affected nearly 100,000 people in Bexley, Dartford and parts of Orpington.
Some people were left without any power for four days.
The power cut was caused when someone broke into an EDF Energy site in Dartford where four major power cables were carried over Dartford Creek on a cable bridge.
During the break-in the cables caught fire, causing considerable damage.
Kent police were unable to establish whether those who broke in were just vandals intent on causing damage, or thieves trying to steal copper wiring to sell for scrap.
Police said their investigation was hampered by a lack of CCTV and the isolation of the site which meant there were no witnesses.
EDF Energy had problems trying to restore power quickly to those who were affected, because there were no alternative power sources.
And the company was forced to bring in the largest number of generators every deployed in London, to provide an intermittent power supply.
EDF Energy declared the incident “an exceptional event” which meant it could not be held to blame and could offer compensation of only £50 to anyone without power for more than 24 hours.
Ofgem asked the auditor to decide whether the power cut was exceptional or whether EDF Energy’s actions , or lack of them, were a contributory factor in what happened.
The auditor was also asked to decide whether EDF took appropriate steps to limit the number of customers affected and restored the electricity supply quickly and efficiently.
If the report finds EDF Energy was partially to blame, it could affect the amount of compensation due to those who made a claim.
It could also cost EDF Energy millions of pounds under the industry’s Interruptions Incentives Scheme.
In the meantime, it has improved security at the site and is repairing the damage, which could take two years to complete.
Comments(6)
DrDBexley
says...
3:26pm Thu 11 Mar 10
bexleyman
says...
4:30pm Fri 12 Mar 10
DrDBexley
says...
9:55am Sat 13 Mar 10
bexleyman
says...
12:03pm Sat 13 Mar 10
DrDBexley wrote:I'll agree in part but I feel we have an irreconcilable difference, I would still say "you shouldn't have burgled me" and it is indeed a very sad damnation of society - you should be able to leave your property without having to heavily safeguard it but yes, knowing this sad state of affairs EDF should have taken preventative measures and therefore are we not left to blame EDF because we have nobody else...
I agree in part, but if you say that the liability lies at the door of the perpetrator then ultimately it lies at the door of society. And since I and EDF know what type of society we're in then we should act accordingly. And also if society is to blame then both myself and EDF are still liable since we're a part of it. You can't say "you shouldn't have burgled me!" when you leave your door open to burglars!
DrDBexley
says...
2:59pm Sat 13 Mar 10
When news happens – email newsdesk, call 01689 885703 or text keyword NEWS SHOPPER along with your news, pictures and videos to 80360.
Enter your postcode, town or place name
Looking for jobs in Bexley or Bromley?
Search Now »
Looking for a date in Lewisham or Greenwich?
Search Now »
Looking for a home in north Kent?
Search Now »
Looking for cars in south east London?
Search Now »
Heard It All Before says...
3:11pm Thu 11 Mar 10