Lost photos found at Swanley Asda returned to owner (From News Shopper)

Newsshopper you realise you have broken the law on publishing someones pictures without consent, i can understand maybe one picture but exposing this person pictures especially the young children is morally wrong!!!!

What's that bloke doing out with my wife and kids!!!???

zooloo its a shame the NS can't post a photo of you in your tin foil hat !!

FFS.

zooloo wrote:
Newsshopper you realise you have broken the law on publishing someones pictures without consent, i can understand maybe one picture but exposing this person pictures especially the young children is morally wrong!!!!

What a load of rubbish!

zooloo wrote:
Newsshopper you realise you have broken the law on publishing someones pictures without consent, i can understand maybe one picture but exposing this person pictures especially the young children is morally wrong!!!!

There is no law.

zooloo wrote:
Newsshopper you realise you have broken the law on publishing someones pictures without consent, i can understand maybe one picture but exposing this person pictures especially the young children is morally wrong!!!!

Maybe they didn't need to post that many pictures, but it's not going to harm anyone. Personally, I'd lost a load of cherished photos, I'd be happy that the local paper did this as it means I'd be reunited with it. Otherwise, there's no real way of getting this back to the rightful owner.

Being the parent of some of the children in the pics i rang the news desk to ask if the pics can be removed as they now know who the owner of the memory card is and was told that the editor says NO!! All i can say is that im not happy with that decision and im waiting for a call back this afternoon, surely now the owner of the card knows where it is there shouldnt be a problem with removing them.

So what harm is it doing?

Poor Newshopper. All they wanted to do was find the owner and they get nothing but grief back. They're doing a good deed people!

i know they are doing a good deed and appreciate that, but surely now the owner has been found and have been asked by me the parent of some of the children to remove my childrens pic from the site they can remove the pics of the children, they do not need to be on there any longer. And would you like your kids pics on a website where they can be easily copied and forwarded etc onto god knows who for god knows wot purpose!
I do not see why they cannot now be removed now that the good deed has been done!

And there we have it.

But it's just a picture of some random kid. Maybe don't believe everything you read in the daily fail about pedos and pictures of kids. This is not the type the pedos would be after. Not to mention the million pictures of kids that can be seen already on the internet.

lisamb2717 wrote:
i know they are doing a good deed and appreciate that, but surely now the owner has been found and have been asked by me the parent of some of the children to remove my childrens pic from the site they can remove the pics of the children, they do not need to be on there any longer. And would you like your kids pics on a website where they can be easily copied and forwarded etc onto god knows who for god knows wot purpose! I do not see why they cannot now be removed now that the good deed has been done!

PMSL - Are you for real ? I wouldn't think that paedophile would want a picture of kids in clothes.

The point im making is that being a parent of the children in the pics i think im within my rights to ask that the pics of my children are removed seeing as the memory card has been returned! As they are no longer need to be on here...funny how u cant see that part isnt it!

lisamb2717 wrote:
The point im making is that being a parent of the children in the pics i think im within my rights to ask that the pics of my children are removed seeing as the memory card has been returned! As they are no longer need to be on here...funny how u cant see that part isnt it!

This is just what you think thou. Saying things like 'i think im within my rights' doesn't atomically mean that's you get what you want. No one is stopping you from asking. But the bull that you have come out with is funny. Don't confuse your opinion with fact.

The bull i have come out with? you are funny! u know wot u sad little individual carry on thinking wot u like and saying wot u like, all im doing is being a good parent and asking for my kids pic to be removed.

I can't see any point in now removing the pictures - surely anyone wanted to make copies (can't imagine why) they would have already done so

Cos they are my children and i asked this morning for them to be removed and i dont wish them to be on here...ok you know wot enough of this crap, you all obviously think im the worlds worst parent for asking for my kids pic to be removed now that they have found the owner of the memory stick so you lot carry on!

lisamb2717 wrote:
The bull i have come out with? you are funny! u know wot u sad little individual carry on thinking wot u like and saying wot u like, all im doing is being a good parent and asking for my kids pic to be removed.

Wot - What
im - I'm

No one has said you're a bad parent. Were did you get that from? I think you're a little deluded to think that a paedophile would want these pictures.
What harm is it doing having these pictures on the here? It no worst than someone taken a picture of their child and your children also being in the picture. Like say at a party or in the park.

I am not arguing anymore, the fact is I did not want my children's pic to be on here any longer than necessary and feel that I am perfectly entitled to have that opinion. If you can't see that then you are the deluded one!

lisamb2717 wrote:
The bull i have come out with? you are funny! u know wot u sad little individual carry on thinking wot u like and saying wot u like, all im doing is being a good parent and asking for my kids pic to be removed.

A good parent will teach their children how to spell what.

lisamb2717 wrote:
I am not arguing anymore, the fact is I did not want my children's pic to be on here any longer than necessary and feel that I am perfectly entitled to have that opinion. If you can't see that then you are the deluded one!

No one said you can't have an opinion.

Anyway they have gone now.............or did some one copy them?????

Photos removed and article updated. We're very happy to have helped return these missing pictures to their owner, and especially pleased that our web appeal worked so quickly.

No-one has suggested you're a bad parent, but despite what some of the more sensational press may suggest there isn't a paedophile around every corner.

And I'm sure they would find a better source of pictures than the News Shopper

By continually adding comments you're actually creating more interest. If you'd simply called NS & left it at that this article would have dropped off the page within a day. It's now heading to the top of the "most commented" list

Dont worry about pictures of ya saucepan lids on the NS, how about everyone knows you shop in Asda in Swanley.

The shame of it !!

the wall wrote:

lisamb2717 wrote:
i know they are doing a good deed and appreciate that, but surely now the owner has been found and have been asked by me the parent of some of the children to remove my childrens pic from the site they can remove the pics of the children, they do not need to be on there any longer. And would you like your kids pics on a website where they can be easily copied and forwarded etc onto god knows who for god knows wot purpose! I do not see why they cannot now be removed now that the good deed has been done!

PMSL - Are you for real ? I wouldn't think that paedophile would want a picture of kids in clothes.

You're right pedophiles don't want a picture of kids in clothes but they do like a photo of a happy smiling child to photo shop onto a picture of a child being sexually abused.

I believe the mum in this instance was right to ask for the photos to be removed.

Oldchap wrote:
No-one has suggested you're a bad parent, but despite what some of the more sensational press may suggest there isn't a paedophile around every corner.

And I'm sure they would find a better source of pictures than the News Shopper

By continually adding comments you're actually creating more interest. If you'd simply called NS & left it at that this article would have dropped off the page within a day. It's now heading to the top of the "most commented" list

Yup - known as the Streisand effect. Babs tried to get pictures of her house removed from the internet. No-one wanted to look at her house anyway, but all the publicity of her trying, yet failing, to get the photos removed caused millions of people to look at the photos - of her house!

Just a quick question for lisamb2717 then: if one of your children won a special school award or was crowned Carnival Queen or something similar, would you allow the photo of your child accepting the award/being crowned to be published in the NS or local paper?

bizzymum wrote:

the wall wrote:

lisamb2717 wrote: i know they are doing a good deed and appreciate that, but surely now the owner has been found and have been asked by me the parent of some of the children to remove my childrens pic from the site they can remove the pics of the children, they do not need to be on there any longer. And would you like your kids pics on a website where they can be easily copied and forwarded etc onto god knows who for god knows wot purpose! I do not see why they cannot now be removed now that the good deed has been done!

PMSL - Are you for real ? I wouldn't think that paedophile would want a picture of kids in clothes.

You're right pedophiles don't want a picture of kids in clothes but they do like a photo of a happy smiling child to photo shop onto a picture of a child being sexually abused. I believe the mum in this instance was right to ask for the photos to be removed.

A) How would this harm the child?
If I was to get a photo of an MP or Banker and stick pins into it, would that they feel the pain ? No.

B) No one has said she has no right to ask.

Anyway happy days the photos have gone.

When 'Brass Eye' did a spoof documentary about paedophiles it was vilified. The programme basically took the mick out of the hysteria surrounding the topic, it showed how ‘celebrities’ would say anything just to be ‘on board’ the bandwagon. Now we are likely to see some of those implicated in the Jimmy Saville matter. The programme poked fun at people like our poster above screaming about the ‘law being broken’. The law actually says you cannot make, download or pass on ‘indecent images’ of children. Sadly that means the pictures of my kids playing in the bath or running around the garden half dressed in the summer may well get some mono celled idiot running to the police screaming ‘abuse’. All you hear now is reactions like that, it’s a shame that common sense is no longer a life skill.

bizzymum wrote:

the wall wrote:

lisamb2717 wrote:
i know they are doing a good deed and appreciate that, but surely now the owner has been found and have been asked by me the parent of some of the children to remove my childrens pic from the site they can remove the pics of the children, they do not need to be on there any longer. And would you like your kids pics on a website where they can be easily copied and forwarded etc onto god knows who for god knows wot purpose! I do not see why they cannot now be removed now that the good deed has been done!

PMSL - Are you for real ? I wouldn't think that paedophile would want a picture of kids in clothes.

You're right pedophiles don't want a picture of kids in clothes but they do like a photo of a happy smiling child to photo shop onto a picture of a child being sexually abused.

I believe the mum in this instance was right to ask for the photos to be removed.

Where did you get such a stupid idea from?
Do you honestly think pedo's scour newspapers to find a picture of a kid and then photo shop their face onto another kids photo.
You mums are so overprotective,and you could even say pathetic.
You better put a bag over your kids head when they are in public,just incase.

lord righteous wrote:

bizzymum wrote:

the wall wrote:

lisamb2717 wrote:
i know they are doing a good deed and appreciate that, but surely now the owner has been found and have been asked by me the parent of some of the children to remove my childrens pic from the site they can remove the pics of the children, they do not need to be on there any longer. And would you like your kids pics on a website where they can be easily copied and forwarded etc onto god knows who for god knows wot purpose! I do not see why they cannot now be removed now that the good deed has been done!

PMSL - Are you for real ? I wouldn't think that paedophile would want a picture of kids in clothes.

You're right pedophiles don't want a picture of kids in clothes but they do like a photo of a happy smiling child to photo shop onto a picture of a child being sexually abused.

I believe the mum in this instance was right to ask for the photos to be removed.

Where did you get such a stupid idea from?
Do you honestly think pedo's scour newspapers to find a picture of a kid and then photo shop their face onto another kids photo.
You mums are so overprotective,and you could even say pathetic.
You better put a bag over your kids head when they are in public,just incase.

Bit naive Lord Righteous but then maybe 'Jim fixed it for you'?

As a mum, I'd rather err on the side of "Just in case".

Would I put a bag over my kids heads - now that really would be silly. Perhaps you wear one .........I won't ask where! X

Just in case....what?

On another NS article (about the waltzing fox) there's a picture of picture of a couple with their baby

Someone better warn them that the photo could be downloaded & used by paedophiles.......

reasonable75 wrote:
On another NS article (about the waltzing fox) there's a picture of picture of a couple with their baby

Someone better warn them that the photo could be downloaded & used by paedophiles.......

I can only guess that the point made on this and another story has been lost.........foxy's parents "chose" to be photographed for NS.

Lost photos at ASDA - A mum (not necessarily the one who owned the memory stick) asked NS to remove photo's of her kids and her request was initially refused (but now thankfully acceded to)!

Ms and Miss Chavette from school with mobile phone - some parents did not want photo's of their kids associated with that particular story. Photo's of their kids were not associated with the news item and were included by NS without their permission. Again parents were within their rights to ask for their kids photos to be removed.

Children don't have the right to reply - they usually depend on an adult to make the 'right decisions' on their behalf. I'd rather be a parent who was aware of the sometimes not very nice world we live in than one who didn't care whether my kids were out robbing, maiming or worse.

I'm glad my previous comment about pedophiles amused you.

And to a previous poster, no you're probably right they don't troll rags like NS for their happy pics, they usually prey on Facebook. How many people post their family snaps there to share with family, friends and ......whoever!

So in a nutshell that's why some parents are so vociferous about their kids privacy and I can only hope you understand why. My opinion only. Goodnight.

bizzymum wrote:

reasonable75 wrote:
On another NS article (about the waltzing fox) there's a picture of picture of a couple with their baby

Someone better warn them that the photo could be downloaded & used by paedophiles.......

I can only guess that the point made on this and another story has been lost.........foxy's parents "chose" to be photographed for NS.

Lost photos at ASDA - A mum (not necessarily the one who owned the memory stick) asked NS to remove photo's of her kids and her request was initially refused (but now thankfully acceded to)!

Ms and Miss Chavette from school with mobile phone - some parents did not want photo's of their kids associated with that particular story. Photo's of their kids were not associated with the news item and were included by NS without their permission. Again parents were within their rights to ask for their kids photos to be removed.

Children don't have the right to reply - they usually depend on an adult to make the 'right decisions' on their behalf. I'd rather be a parent who was aware of the sometimes not very nice world we live in than one who didn't care whether my kids were out robbing, maiming or worse.

I'm glad my previous comment about pedophiles amused you.

And to a previous poster, no you're probably right they don't troll rags like NS for their happy pics, they usually prey on Facebook. How many people post their family snaps there to share with family, friends and ......whoever!

So in a nutshell that's why some parents are so vociferous about their kids privacy and I can only hope you understand why. My opinion only. Goodnight.

Unless the person(s) in the photo(s) held the copyright then the permission to use them is not needed.

reasonable75 wrote:
On another NS article (about the waltzing fox) there's a picture of picture of a couple with their baby Someone better warn them that the photo could be downloaded & used by paedophiles.......

Too right. That foxes head could be Photoshopped onto any indecent image!

PaulErith wrote:

reasonable75 wrote: On another NS article (about the waltzing fox) there's a picture of picture of a couple with their baby Someone better warn them that the photo could be downloaded & used by paedophiles.......

Too right. That foxes head could be Photoshopped onto any indecent image!

IMHO you're a idiot.

the wall wrote:

PaulErith wrote:

reasonable75 wrote: On another NS article (about the waltzing fox) there's a picture of picture of a couple with their baby Someone better warn them that the photo could be downloaded & used by paedophiles.......

Too right. That foxes head could be Photoshopped onto any indecent image!

IMHO you're a idiot.

Please tell me you didn't think it was a serious comment? I don't think you could be that daft, surely? It was just a light hearted remark! Get a sense of humour.

I have a sense of humour, just let me know when you write something funny.