Dartford MP defends burglary victim firing shotgun

Mansell (left) and O'Gorman (right) Mansell (left) and O'Gorman (right)

DARTFORD MP Gareth Johnson has said homeowners “should be able to use whatever force they like” to defend their homes from burglars.

His statement comes after a judge jailed two burglars who were shot while breaking into a house in Welby, Leicestershire.

Mr Johnson said: “We must remember that the real victims are the homeowners, not the burglars.”

Joshua O'Gorman, 27, and Daniel Mansell, 33, broke into the house of Andy Ferrie, 35, in the early hours of September 2.

Prosecutor Alan Murphy told Leicester crown court one of the men reached for a knife before Mr Ferrie used a legally-owned shotgun to fire at the intruders.

O'Gorman was shot in the face and Mansell in the right hand.

They fled and police arrested Mr and Mrs Ferrie on suspicion of causing grievous bodily harm.

They were not charged.

Judge Michael Pert told defendants on September 26: "I make it plain that, in my judgment, being shot is not mitigation.

"If you burgle a house in the country where the householder owns a legally-held shotgun, that is the chance you take.

"You cannot come to court and ask for a lighter sentence because of it.”

The Dartford’s MP said: “In recent years we have seen too many instances of victims of crime coming under fire for defending themselves or their property and I think it is important that the balance is redressed.

“I welcome the judge’s decision and think it sends out the right message: these two individuals entered a private property with full intention of committing burglary.

“Burglary rates in Kent fell by 5% last year and whilst this is good news for our residents, I believe it would be even lower if we made it clearer for homeowners what rights they have to defend their property.

"Provided that grossly disproportionate force is not used then a homeowner should be able to use whatever force they like to stop someone burgling their home.

“We need burglars to feel afraid and not homeowners.”

Comments(5)

Guess who ;) AGAIN ! says...
11:51am Fri 28 Sep 12

J. Purdy & Sons make the best burglar alarms in the world.

Get yaself a licence and get one or even two, his and hers like.

goldenbroomboy says...
1:23pm Fri 28 Sep 12

"Provided that grossly disproportionate force is not used then a homeowner should be able to use whatever force they like to stop someone burgling their home."

This contradicts itself. If Tory New Boy is going to get his soundbites from the Daily Wail at least choose the more sensible ones.

PaulErith says...
1:27pm Fri 28 Sep 12

Totally agree. The minute a burglar enters a property, then in my opinion they've lost their rights. If they end up dead, then tough. That's the risk they take. There should be no comeback on the homeowner.

DrDBexley says...
1:38pm Tue 2 Oct 12

It is nice to see a bit of sense and loyalty being given to the law abiding as a result of this case - personally I think Florida's "trespass" law is something to look to where a person in the boundaries of a property can be deemed to be trespassing by the home owner and whatever action deemed fit by the home owner can be taken if needs be.

It's up to the people being there to prove they had a valid, law abiding reason for being there rather than the other way round.

idiots34 says...
9:43pm Tue 2 Oct 12

Yet again more busy bodies

click2find

About cookies

We want you to enjoy your visit to our website. That's why we use cookies to enhance your experience. By staying on our website you agree to our use of cookies. Find out more about the cookies we use.

I agree