Poorer people will be hit hardest by Council Tax Benefit reform, says north Kent council leader

Councillor John Burden Councillor John Burden

VULNERABLE people will hit hardest by reforms to Council Tax Benefit, a north Kent council leader has warned.

The benefit – received by around 9,000 households in Gravesham, 7,200 in Dartford and 2,000 in Swanley – will be axed by the Government on April 1 next year and councils will be forced to make up the shortfall.

Gravesham Council leader, Councillor John Burden, said it could be as unpopular as the infamous Poll Tax, which led to riots in 1990.

He said: “It is almost like we are going back to the Victorian workhouse scenario – severe poverty where people have no future and no way forward.”

Councils currently assess claims for council tax benefits and pay out the cash, which is reimbursed.

From next year, the Government is cutting funding by 10 per cent and telling councils to decide who gets how much.

To make things more difficult, the Government has said that pensioners – who make up around half of claimants – should not see a cut.

That means the remainder must bear more of a burden. That group comprises low earners, the unemployed, the poor and the disabled.

Cllr Burden said: “They are taking the money away from people we need to be helping. It is wrong.”

He added: “The cycle of poverty will get worse.

“If people think it will just be what they perceive to be benefit scroungers they are wrong – it will be their uncles, fathers, nephews and nieces.”

Both Gravesham and Sevenoaks councils are seeking opinions on the plans and are suggesting a blanket reduction for all claimants of around 18.5 per cent.

Under that scheme, a person living in an “average” house in Swanley and receiving Council Tax Benefit for the full value of their council tax (£1,503 a year) will get £1,225, leaving them to find £278 a year, or £5.35 a week.

Other benefits will not be affected and the reduction will be calculated in the same way as the current system.

Both Gravesham and Sevenoaks hope to make up some of the shortfall by reducing the exemption for vacant properties from six months to three.

Dartford Council has yet to publish its plans.

Cllr Burden said: “We hope people understand we have to make the best of a bad deal. We are trying to be as fair as we can to everybody.”

Sevenoaks Council leader, Councillor Peter Fleming said: “Although we don’t expect anybody that claims will be happy, at least it is fair.”

Gravesham Council’s consultation period ends on October 8, with Sevenoak’s ending on September 30. Both councils are seeking views from claimants and non-claimants. Go to Sevenoaks.gov.uk/ctaxsupport or Gravesham.gov.uk/ctconsultation.

Comments(3)

mouthalmighty says...
10:06pm Sat 11 Aug 12

This is cruel. A lot of people are on the bread line due to no fault of their own. This will just increase their distress at their situation. Can't they find someone else to penalise.

handymanchris says...
1:12am Sun 12 Aug 12

im sure people will be able to find the £21.40 a month to save,
Those who are unemployed and have the same luxuries as those who work should be told what to give up.

Sky tv, smoking, alcohol, iPhones, flat screen tv's. There not a right to have and they can be lived without.

Those who are disabled, usually through no fault of their own should not be hit with this along with pensioners.

It may sound like im "targeting" those who are unemployed but when your taking handouts left right and centre and not doing a days work for it, you should be grateful of the society we have and do whats asked for receiving that money.

People need to start living to their means and not trying to live above them, then everyone would have a spare few quid for a luxury

PaulErith says...
9:35am Sun 12 Aug 12

handymanchris wrote:
im sure people will be able to find the £21.40 a month to save, Those who are unemployed and have the same luxuries as those who work should be told what to give up. Sky tv, smoking, alcohol, iPhones, flat screen tv's. There not a right to have and they can be lived without. Those who are disabled, usually through no fault of their own should not be hit with this along with pensioners. It may sound like im "targeting" those who are unemployed but when your taking handouts left right and centre and not doing a days work for it, you should be grateful of the society we have and do whats asked for receiving that money. People need to start living to their means and not trying to live above them, then everyone would have a spare few quid for a luxury
Agree totally. Most people on benefits still have a lot of luxuries. Give up your mobile phone contract and save the money. Benefits should be there for those who genuinely need it and it should provide the absolute basic level of living to make sure people aren't below the poverty line. However, if they haven't got a TV or mobile phone, then tough. Get a job and then have these luxuries.

click2find

About cookies

We want you to enjoy your visit to our website. That's why we use cookies to enhance your experience. By staying on our website you agree to our use of cookies. Find out more about the cookies we use.

I agree