Donald Andrews gets life for raping woman and throwing her over bridge into river

Killer gets life for raping woman and throwing her over bridge into river Killer gets life for raping woman and throwing her over bridge into river

A CONVICTED killer who left a woman for dead after beating her unconscious, raping her repeatedly and pushing her over a bridge into a river may never be released from prison.

Donald Andrews's victim watched as the 48-year-old was told he must serve a life sentence for the ordeal he inflicted on her.

It started in the early hours of September 18 last year when he took her back from the Star and Garter pub in Bromley High Street to his flat in nearby Tweedy Road.

Instead of letting her phone for a taxi he double locked the door, beat her up and raped her several times throughout the night and into the next day.

Woolwich Crown Court heard Andrews then made her take a bath and wash her hair in an attempt to destroy forensic evidence before he told her he would take her to the train station.

Instead he then took her to a wooded area where he raped her again.

Then he told her he had killed before and that his plan was to kill her and chop her body into pieces.

Andrews then beat up the woman, who cannot be named for legal reasons, threw her over a bridge into the River Quaggy and left her for dead.

Before sentencing the victim's impact statement was read out in court.

In it she said: "I can never get away from the pain.

"Before this I had a normal sex life, now I feel nothing but emptiness.

"I want to be able to go out again and be normal again.

"I have given up hope of being able to dance again but I want to be able to walk again.

"Every time I close my eyes I can see his face and feel the weight of him on me.

"Sometimes I wake up with blood under my fingernails from scratching myself at night."

Andrews pleaded guilty to all charges.

As well as the life sentence Andrews was also given a five year sentence for false imprisonment and a five year sentence for actual bodily harm, to be served concurrently.

The court heard he had a string of violent previous convictions including two for manslaughter.

Comments(6)

lord righteous says...
5:31pm Fri 18 May 12

"may never be released from prison. "
"The court heard he had a string of violent previous convictions including two for manslaughter"

Our judicial system is an absolute joke,thanks to the do gooders and tree huggers.
I hope you are satisfied!

Nixster says...
6:41pm Fri 18 May 12

Can't we have a system where crimes have an automatic, mandatory, minimum time, and only in exceptional circumstances can this be reduced, no time off for 'being good' whilst in Prison, extra time if you're not! What's this BS about time being served concurrently too? NO! Different crimes and/or different times, ADD them together. Build MORE Prisons, remove the Filth of Society, they will not play by the rules that govern us all. If all of the Law abiding feel like this, then why isn't it so? Democracy? Really?

bizzymum says...
8:36pm Fri 18 May 12

How the hell do you have two, TWO, previous convictions for manslaughter and still be at liberty to commit such a heinous crime. Speechless!

Cask Master says...
9:42am Sat 19 May 12

We don't need more prisons, just a proper way of dealing with this scum. Pass him over, i'm sure many people reading this article will know the way he should be dealt with.

Mangetout says...
11:07am Sat 19 May 12

lord righteous wrote:
"may never be released from prison. "
"The court heard he had a string of violent previous convictions including two for manslaughter"

Our judicial system is an absolute joke,thanks to the do gooders and tree huggers.
I hope you are satisfied!
"may never be released from prison" MAY never!!! Why may? This means he will be out sometime to completely ruin someone else's life.
Would it be the same justice if it were a judges or politicians wife, sister or daughter? I suspect not.

Slonik says...
10:21am Sun 20 May 12

So this scumbag was responsible for killing 2 people (amongst other things) and yet was free to try to make it number 3??
Can anyone explain to me the value of concurrent sentences? They seem a total waste of time to me and must rub considerable salt in the victims' wounds. If sentences had to be served consecutively, scum like this guy might modify their behaviour but, at the very least, they'd be out of harm's way for a lot longer!
Life? Yeah right! What's the betting this guy will be out in less than 10 years?

click2find

About cookies

We want you to enjoy your visit to our website. That's why we use cookies to enhance your experience. By staying on our website you agree to our use of cookies. Find out more about the cookies we use.

I agree