News RSS Feed


Biggin Hill Airport Olympic Games proposals enter final week of consultation

Biggin Hill Airport has put in a request to Bromley Council to extend opening hours during the Olympic Games in 2012 Biggin Hill Airport has put in a request to Bromley Council to extend opening hours during the Olympic Games in 2012

As the consultation about Biggin Hill Airport extending operating hours for the Olympic Games enters its final week, reporter DAVID MILLS examines the proposals.

WHAT ARE THE PROPOSALS?

Biggin Hill Airport has requested permission from its landlord Bromley Council to open from 6.30am to 11pm each day from July 13 to September 23 in 2012.

Its current opening hours are between 6.30am and 10pm in the week and from 9am to 8pm at weekends.

Under the proposals, there would be an estimated extra 668 flights during the Olympic peak 31 day period, which comes to an additional 21 flights per day on top of the current average of 32.

The airport also wants a relaxation of the ban on fare-paying passengers but will charge a £3 passenger tax payable to the council.

Biggin Hill Airport has put in a request to Bromley Council to extend opening hours during the Olympic Games in 2012

FROM TROJAN HORSE TO TERRORISM

Opponents to the proposals fear a temporary change to the opening hours could become permanent.

A London Borough of Bromley Residents’ Federation survey found that 22 of the 38 associations across the borough have voted against the changes.

Seven groups supported the plans while the rest are yet to respond.

Environment group Bromley Friends of the Earth is also against the plans citing fears of an increase in noise, road traffic, pollution and danger of aircraft accidents.

John Davison, of Farnborough Park, Orpington, said: “This is clearly a Trojan horse exercise because the only way that the cost and capital expenditure for adapting existing facilities to accommodate the significant increase in both traffic and passengers can be recouped is to continue the exercise well into the future and, almost certainly, with a gradual but inexorable increase in both flying and passengers.”

Trevor Barham, aged 53, of Amherst Drive, Orpington, said: “As Britain will be on the highest security footing during this period, consider a terrorist rocket fired at close range to a landing aircraft at night over Petts Wood and the resultant deaths that would occur.

“I trust the disasters and emergency committee of Bromley Council already have plans in place for such an event.”

Biggin Hill Airport has put in a request to Bromley Council to extend opening hours during the Olympic Games in 2012

‘THIS IS THE OLYMPICS - WHY SHOULDN’T WE BENEFIT?’

The Biggin Hill & District Residents’ Association backs the airport’s proposals.

Chairman David Haslam said: “A survey of the people of Biggin Hill showed something like 80 per cent of the population accepted the airport and want to see it successful so long as it doesn’t impinge on their environment.

“How often does this country get the Olympics? We’re all paying for the building of the Olympic park. Doesn’t it make sense that where we can take advantage of business opportunities that we should be doing so, especially on behalf of rate payers in this borough? Why shouldn’t we benefit?”

Orpington MP Jo Johnson

‘IMPORTANT WE BACK OLYMPIC EFFORT’

Orpington MP Jo Johnson is concerned about creating a precedent if the airport’s proposals are approved.

While supportive of getting behind the Olympic effort, Mr Johnson said it was paramount those living under the flight path were given “the greatest weight” in any decision.

Mr Johnson said: “It's important everybody swings behind the Olympic effort. It's a national event, we all have a contribution to make.

“However I am extremely concerned at the possibility that we accidentally in support of the Olympics set a precedent that considerably changes the nature of the airport to the detriment of very large residential communities who could suffer as a result.”

HOW TO RESPOND TO CONSULTATION

The consultation period closes at 5pm on February 18.

Email comments to airport.consultation@bromley.gov.uk or write to Bromley Council’s Renewal and Recreation Department, Airport Consultation, Bromley Civic Centre, Stockwell Close, Bromley BR1 3UH.

The council has not yet set a date for its decision.

Comments(4)

glenn_london says...
9:03am Sun 13 Feb 11

Biggin Hill was there when all of us bought property within the area and is a solid employer. There is no more chance of a terrorist strikes because it will be open until 11pm then there would be under it's current operating hours, this is just pure scare mongering. Let Biggin Hill operate as an airport and don't stop its expansion, the people running it know their business far better than any of us non aviation business 'experts'.

JohnWallace says...
3:56pm Thu 17 Feb 11

I'll second what Glenn says, It really gets my goat when the NIMBY's trot out ridiculous statements like Trevor Barham, aged 53, of Amherst Drive, Orpington above.

There are much more tempting targets for terrorists than a light jet over petts wood

I doubt Mr Barham and the other NIMBY's complained that they got to buy their houses for slightly less than they otherwise would have, being under the flight path of an airport.


The airports looking for a measley 10 week extension of hours over a specific period in order to cope with the increase in forecast aircraft, modern jets are vanishingly quiter than they were just 10 years ago the impact should be minimal and the gains should benefit the local community.

If you want to stand against the extra jobs and revenue that would bring to the area so you dont get "disturbed" then that strikes me as a little selfish.

Rose&Thorn says...
2:19pm Sat 26 Feb 11

Perhaps John Wallace might consider that only a very small quote from a letter was used re Terrorism at Biggin Hill Airport. The airport is not used to full capacity during existing operating hours and the so called NIMBY's accept additional flights may be required, but during EXISTING times.
The additional jobs will only be created if the proposed 76 bedroom hotel is built (with or without the Olympics). All airport staff would be expected to work overtime or specialist agency staff bought in for the limited timescale for any additional flights.
There are also far superior methods of gaining access to the Olympics as opposed to sitting in a traffic jam through Bromley - London City Airport (DLR or Road), Eurostar, Stansted (M11 or Stansted Express), Southend Airport (new direct rail link or dual carriagway to Stratford) Gatwick (Thameslink or road).
Note an ESTIMATED additional 668 flights is quoted - are these all Biggin Hill or a total to all airports?

Could John explain "Vanishingly quiter" as it does not make sense.

JohnWallace says...
8:15am Mon 7 Mar 11

Thank you Rose, clearly my misspelling of quieter invalidates my case, I was merely referring to the fact that modern light engines are very quiet.

The reason I focused on trevors terrorism quote is because the Newshopper decided it was important enough to include a reference to terrorism under the picture of Biggin Hill airport, because nothing gets people riled up like the thought of an al-queda cell operating in pets-wood.
I'm not sure how you can say "so called" with regard to the blatant NIMBYism here.
They don't accept that increased flights are necessary and seem to hate the airport in every Possible way. This is demonstrated by the opposition lodged in the comments sections of publications like this, every time there is any development reported at the airport.

The merits of the various airports access points to the games will have been assessed by much more competant people than you or I. They have deemed that Biggin Hill will make a good access point to the games, so are acting upon that.

I'd assume the 668 flights quoted is at Biggin hill as they talk about it's daily average of 32 and this being an increase of 21 per day.

I dont have anything greater than idle speculation regarding how and what jobs will be created at Biggin due to these increased opening hours/movements I assume your certainty is based on something greater? I'd guess that with an extra 668 movements planed they're looking at a bit more than some temps and a bit of overtime

click2find

Most popular


About cookies

We want you to enjoy your visit to our website. That's why we use cookies to enhance your experience. By staying on our website you agree to our use of cookies. Find out more about the cookies we use.

I agree