News RSS Feed


Blackheath Rugby Club doctor pens 'revolutionary' story of Jesus Christ

Dr Adam Bradford with his book The Jesus Discovery Dr Adam Bradford with his book The Jesus Discovery

JESUS was the son of an architect, born at his father’s family home and rising to become a top Rabbi before his death.

That is the claim of a “revolutionary” book on the life of Christ, written by Dr Adam Bradford - a 49-year-old historian, GP and doctor for Blackheath Rugby Club.

Blackheath resident Dr Bradford took two years to write his book The Jesus Discovery, using his psychological expertise and comparing the original Greek and Hebrew texts.

He said: “Reading the texts, it was becoming more and more obvious that the person drawing such a reaction couldn’t possibly have been uneducated.”

Dr Bradford claims Jesus would only have been treated with great respect and, later, chastisement if he was an educated member of the priesthood.

He said: “At the point he is found guilty of blasphemy there’s a huge swing against him. They go from having been respectful to spitting in his face - that’s the psychology of betrayal.

“He betrayed everything they stood for - but he did it from a place of seniority, not obscurity.”

Dr Bradford points out Jesus is referred to as “Rabbi” and “Doctor of the Law” and is described evicting money changers from a temple, showing he had the authority to do so.

And by studying the original scriptures, Dr Bradford believes the Greek word for “architect” and has been mistranslated as “carpenter” when referring to Joseph.

He says: “I’m certain Joseph was Herod’s architect and a trainer of his temple’s priests.”

The doctor claims this gives new meaning to the Bible passage where Jesus is feared lost and found in the temple, saying: “Didn’t you know I must be in my father’s house?”.

He also believes the word for “guest room” has been translated as “inn”, and speculates that Christ was born in a stable at Joseph’s family’s house.

And Dr Bradford claims Jesus would have been recognised as a “child prodigy” by priests, kept on to rise through the religious ranks.

He said: “It’s like Alex Ferguson discovering David Beckham. It would have been illogical to ignore him.”

Dr Bradford said: “The book’s attracted a huge amount of attention. It’s revolutionising people’s understanding of who this person Jesus was.

“What is does is puts Jesus much higher in the theological tree in terms of the Jewish society he lived in.”

Comments(22)

Lukeyboy says...
1:49pm Thu 15 Apr 10

Theres me thinking he was the son of God...how wrong I was.

greenjack says...
3:19pm Thu 15 Apr 10

"....how wrong I was."
You said it Lukeyboy. Just another myth.

tim58 says...
6:54pm Thu 15 Apr 10

Fascinating. Might explain why Jesus was never dismissed by the authorities as uneducated or side-lined as irrelevant. I checked this out and there is an mp3 link to a lecture the guy gave on this at www.templehouse-publ
ishing.com
The article is about Jesus' humanity - who he was as a first century person, not mainly his divinity as the Son of God. An ordained Jesus is a slightly different take to the traditional chair maker line...
The Telegraph covered this as well -
http://www.telegraph
.co.uk/news/newstopi
cs/religion/7547540/
Jesus-was-son-of-an-
architect-book-claim
s.html
Makes you think...

tim58 says...
7:38pm Thu 15 Apr 10

Actually Beckham is a good example of a genius (at football) whose talent was oicked up early, just as Jesus wowed the teachers in the temple aged 12. They trained the rabbis.

Steveoac3 says...
11:37am Mon 19 Apr 10

Makes you think architect as a job and architect of the universe- it just seems to fit. Jesus was the most influential man in all or human history so another fresh look at him must be worth at least considering.

stangain says...
3:21pm Mon 19 Apr 10

What sad comments from Lukeyboy and Greenjack. I have read this book and it does nothing to take away the fact that Jesus is the Son of God.

What it does do is shed new understanding on Jesus as 'the Son of God made flesh'. It helps very much in understanding, for example, why fishermen with a thriving business would just instantly give it up to follow Jesus. As a respected Rabbi and teacher this makes sense of their actions.

Similarly, if he was a simple carpenter he would have been arrested by the Temple Guard when he turfed the money-changers out of the Temple. For those who are serious of learning more about Jesus this book is worth attention.

greenjack says...
10:52am Tue 20 Apr 10

I don't doubt it's a good book Stangain, in fact I may get it myself. But it's not "sad" to comment or question Jesus' divinity, just realistic. "Jesus the son of god" is a myth created merely to impress . "Jesus the Man" is (or was)reality I'm afraid.

greenjack says...
10:55am Tue 20 Apr 10

ps; "It has served us well, this myth of Christ. "
Pope Leo X

Dann456123 says...
7:00pm Thu 22 Apr 10

Sounds like very intresting stuff. Dr Bradford must have put a lot of effort to find things that have been around for a long time but no one has spotted. Must get a book.

tim58 says...
11:06pm Thu 22 Apr 10

Greenjack - Hardly a myth - more evidence for Jesus than for any of the Caesars - much more - have u heard the mp3 yet?

greenjack says...
11:11am Fri 23 Apr 10

Read my post again tim58, "Jesus son of god" is the myth. You show me the evidence. & I mean real contempoary evidence. Even evidence for Jesus the man is scant. Plus I think there are more coins with Ceasars' heads on them than there are ANY artefacts with an identifiable image of Jesus (even if you include the odd potato, pork scratching or burnt pan).

tim58 says...
6:35pm Fri 23 Apr 10

Fair enough Greenjack - no coins but plenty of papyrus, much more than any Caesar, papyrus gives us what was said, rather than what someone looked like, the the coins tended to flatter them anyway. Jesus the man is mentioned in the Talmud as having been killed for apostasy - that would fit the blasphemy charges the 4 Gospel biographers agree on. What blasphemy? Calling yourself God would do it - that is what he was accused of. So what's the evidence?
Try the resurrection - a guarded tomb, sealed, heavy stone, certified death, then empty tomb + no body ever produced, eye-witness reports saw him alive + even eating. So much evidence that hard-nosed working types all get killed for saying it was true. Still happening today. Maybe there's something in it?

greenjack says...
11:35am Sat 24 Apr 10

In which case tim58 I rest my case. There are in fact NO papyri that date to the time of Jesus that actualy mention him. The earliest text we have dates to about the third century (if I remember correctly). The fact that there are plenty of texts that do date to that time, and earlier, and still he isn't mentioned is a little odd for someone supposedly that important. So what we are left with are the "myths" I mentioned in stories such as the resurrection, or any of the gospel stories for that matter. We don't have originals only texts "attributed" to a particular apostle or close associate (coincidently a criteria for inlusion in the cannon, surprise surprise). If you fancy any reading on this subject I can recommend anytghing by Prof Bart Ehrman. He's not too heavy going but quite consise.
Best wishes.
GJ

Pagansense says...
10:06pm Sun 25 Apr 10

Not another re-write of that old fairy tale! For what was essentially a foreign religion this one really did take a hold. And look at all the strife it has caused, war, death and unhappiness to name but a few. I do not doubt this guy lived, I do not doubt he did a lot of good deeds what I do doubt is the ever changing story of the 'son of god' bit. And when we grow up most of us realise the only way to have a sin forgiven is to say sorry to the person you wronged. The book shelves are heaving with all these 'holy' books gathering dust, do we really need another re-write?

tim58 says...
6:35am Mon 26 Apr 10

Hi GJ. There is a papyrus of John's gospel in Manchester Uni Library from 70AD, + new ones get unearthed from time to time.
Josephus written shortly after 70AD mentions Jesus twice, not bad for so£eone killed for being supposedly anti-Roman, given that Josephus was working for them.
I will try + find your book; in return I recommend Who Moved The Stone by Frank Morrisson. Amazon have it. To defeat the son of God thing it is necessary to disprove the resurrection. Cheers,
Tim

tim58 says...
3:10pm Mon 26 Apr 10

Hi pagansense.
The thing is the vast majority of human beings believe in a God of some type or other. So when someone comes along + claims to be him/her come as a baby (ie 'son of God') to live as a human that tends to attract people's interest.since with Jesus it was 2000 years ago, new bits of archaeology + relevant historical evidence for him turns up + gets looked at. That's the thing with history + where the study of it differs from 'fairy tales'. Jesus did claim to be God - it was what got him killed. So either he was telling the truth (makes sense of the resurrection) or he was lying (seems unlikely since he was a good type of bloke) or he was deluded / a bit mad (seems unlikely since his material is still taught today + hasn't been bettered).
Which do you reckon it is?
Cheers,
Tim

greenjack says...
10:50pm Mon 26 Apr 10

Sorry tim58 but that fragment of John's gospel dates to the first half of the second century AD, still not contemporary. Also seeing someone alive would suggest that they probably didn't actually die in the frst place. Yes Josephus is said to mention him but even this is debatable as genuine. I think the annals of Rome do also but not near so much or with the same claims as the gospels. Lets face it most of the god-like attributes given to Jesus were not unique. If you wanted to impress, your god would have to have as good, if not better, attributes as everyone elses gods, e.g. resurrection, virgin birth. I would include miracles but they were ten a penny to most prophets in those days.
I will check out your book ref. BTW, cheers.
GJ

Pagansense says...
5:56pm Wed 28 Apr 10

Hi there Tim, Having looked at many of the stories and experienced the opinions of 'churchy' people first hand I feel it may be a little of each (rumours usually are). Yes there is probably an element of truth in the tales in that this guy did some remakable things, he was probably an illusionist (an illusionist is someone who generally performs in front of large crowds. In contrast to “close-up” magicians, illusionists use a larger area to perform their act.). There is an element of lies which happens when rumours catch on (Chinese whispers) and he could have been deluded into believing his own lies by all the attention he was getting! What I do know is this 'story' was used by a conquering nation to bend the folk of these isles to their will. Much of 'his material' can be sourced to earlier beliefs and a good majority of the stories themselves have been twisted to suit the ruler at the time! This was a story of a clever guy that was manipulated.

tim58 says...
10:05am Thu 29 Apr 10

Hi again Greenjack
re: Rylands Library, Manchester Uni , its the comarative texual accuracy that tells us they are reliable rather than an inexact dating process. Remember, the Romans burnt everything in 70AD.
Josephus mentions Jesus twice - only 1 has been debated.
Bringing someone who has been dead + buried for 3 days back to life is not your common or garden miracle - it seems that was tipped it for the authorities who got him killed...

tim58 says...
10:13am Thu 29 Apr 10

Hi pagansense.
Getting killed + coming back to life is a pretty good illusion - shame some of our politicians don't try it!
This about history, not some man-made 'religion' - a man who claimed to be God, got killed + then was seen by a lot of people alive enough to eat - either he was God or he wasn't. People back then knew death well enough to tell when someone was dead. if he is still alive then he is knowable spiritually, not by 'religion' necessarily.

greenjack says...
10:37am Thu 29 Apr 10

Firstly the Romans didn't burn everything in 70AD, only what they got their hands on. The Qumran scrolls predate 70AD , however they don't mention Jesus ???
Secondly Josephus mentions Jesus twice? Big deal.
Thirdly you are still assuming the gospel stories to be accurate. His cricifixion, never mind the resurrection, is debateable. Plus even if he was crucified, it was for a comparatively short time (again if the gospels are considered true) and he was not buried. He was placed in a tomb/cave of some description with 3 days in which to recover enough to be removed. Don't forget there are no recorded eye-witnesses, even in the gospels. Only those that claim to have seen him after the alleged event.

Pagansense says...
3:54pm Thu 29 Apr 10

tim58 wrote:
Hi pagansense.
Getting killed + coming back to life is a pretty good illusion - shame some of our politicians don't try it!
This about history, not some man-made 'religion' - a man who claimed to be God, got killed + then was seen by a lot of people alive enough to eat - either he was God or he wasn't. People back then knew death well enough to tell when someone was dead. if he is still alive then he is knowable spiritually, not by 'religion' necessarily.
Hi Tim,
Getting killed + coming back to life is a pretty good illusion,
Yep there are many ways of staging this!

This about history, not some man-made 'religion'

There are many other man made religions in history!

The problem is more books like this one on the subject only help to perpetuate this particular myth.

click2find

Most popular


About cookies

We want you to enjoy your visit to our website. That's why we use cookies to enhance your experience. By staying on our website you agree to our use of cookies. Find out more about the cookies we use.

I agree