News RSS Feed


VIDEO - SOLE STREET: Traveller families evicted


HOMES were dragged away, fences smashed and paving ripped up as families of travellers were evicted from green belt land.

Bailiffs from Gravesham Council, supported by police officers, arrived at the site off White Post Lane in Sole Street at 7am today(June 29) to enforce eviction notices served in February.

The 39 people who live on the site, which includes 20 children, watched as their fences were torn down, caravans and static mobile homes dragged out, and paving ripped up by diggers.

Margaret Ford said: “We can’t believe this is happening. We have nowhere to go and don’t know what to do.”

The 36-year-old added: “Our children are going to come home from school to find their homes have gone.”

Although the travellers own the land, they have breached government green belt rules by developing on it.

Gravesham Council has prepared a site for the families off Springhead Road in Northfleet, but they have so far turned it down.

For a couple of hours after the bailiffs and police arrived, there was a stand-off while the families gathered inside their homes to decide what to do.

Then, they slowly began coming out and packing up their possessions, and one man attached his caravan to the back of his truck and drove it through a fence into the field next to the site.

Others followed, and gradually caravans, vehicles, and belongings were moved from the site to the field.

From there, the process of the static mobile homes being dragged onto the field and diggers rolling in to tear up paving began.

There had been a tense yet peaceful atmosphere, with the families and bailiffs working together to clear the site, but tempers boiled over as the first static home was dragged away.

Mrs Ford says her 57-year-old father, Martin Ward, was pinned down by the police and “sprayed in the eyes” after arguing with them.

Officers on the scene and a police spokeswoman could not confirm this incident happened or whether Mr Ward had been arrested.

Although the travellers own the field their belongings were dragged to, it is also green belt land so they cannot stay there permanently.

Mrs Ford said: “We don’t know where we’re going to go. The site the council have offered us is too small and not good enough.”

Officers from Gravesham Council have set up an advice centre for the families in St Mary’s Church hall in Manor Road.

The travellers arrived on the land over a weekend in October 2004 and set up the site.

Since then they have been locked in a lengthy legal battle with Gravesham Council, which rejected their retrospective planning applications for the site.

Speaking on Monday, council leader Councillor Mike Snelling said: “This situation has gone on long enough and I very much hope today’s actions will bring this sorry episode to a speedy and peaceful conclusion.”

“The council cannot allow planning laws to be flouted, especially on land designated as green belt.”

Comments(21)

madras says...
2:51pm Mon 29 Jun 09

well, they've had nearly 5 years of living outside of planning conditions, and should really have been able to make contingency plans during this time. If I built illegally on my property I'd expect the same treatment. Alternative site been offered, what more can the council do?

Make Life says...
2:54pm Mon 29 Jun 09

They done the building work ilegally and they broke the rules so they have to go. They have somewhere else to go but "its not good enough" If you dont like it then tough, live rough!!

It's Me again ! says...
3:24pm Mon 29 Jun 09

But does it REALLY matter ?
Couldn'tn they have stayed ?

However, I find it strange that the families won't go to the site that the council has set up for them

Make Life says...
3:29pm Mon 29 Jun 09

They couldnt have stayed because if they had then they would keep building and getting away with it. As Madras said, if you or I had built illegally then we would have the book thrown at us so why are they different?

doc 1 says...
3:51pm Mon 29 Jun 09

This is a disgrace and must stop NOW! The concil are just useing the law to bully these people.
Look in Gravesend town centre what Barrents have done to the town centre, They have left it like a building site. No word of taking them to court for vandalism our invicting them from there site.
Thats why they call it justice, because it is just for us.
I must say this in stong terms indeed STOP! STOP now and give these chirldern there right to live somewere, which to me is more inportant the a pit off green space.

It's Me again ! says...
3:57pm Mon 29 Jun 09

Make Life wrote:
They couldnt have stayed because if they had then they would keep building and getting away with it. As Madras said, if you or I had built illegally then we would have the book thrown at us so why are they different?
True!
but just seems silly that you cant bulid on land you have bought.

oh well lol

tj.kent says...
4:16pm Mon 29 Jun 09

If you buy green belt land,you are fully aware of the restrictions on building, if it was not green belt land and 'Development Land' the cost of buying the site would be Millions of pounds, that is why the travellers do what they do! If the council knew that the other land was owned by them, why did the court order not cover all the land. Another waste of money on legals fee's is coming!

madras says...
7:22pm Mon 29 Jun 09

'they say they do not know where they will go next' - how about buying some development land, legitimately, and setting up there. Or the land the council has offered them...

Gypo says...
8:09pm Mon 29 Jun 09

Hows about in Petts Wood, will that suit ya. The Newsshopper car park is a good place to me.

madras says...
11:16am Tue 30 Jun 09

that's the attitude, why occupy an otherwise un-wanted piece of land when you could make a pain of yourselves in someone else's property - and you wonder why travellers get a bad name. Top marks gypo for setting your cause back decades...

Gypo says...
11:32am Tue 30 Jun 09

Madras I take it that means you don't want them in Petts Wood.
Not in my back yard ha. Typical !!

Make Life says...
11:44am Tue 30 Jun 09

Gypo wrote:
Madras I take it that means you don't want them in Petts Wood. Not in my back yard ha. Typical !!
No one wants them in their back yard!!! They create mess and the ones that ive come across are not law abiding, they are theives.

Gypo says...
12:08pm Tue 30 Jun 09

Make Life wrote:
Gypo wrote: Madras I take it that means you don't want them in Petts Wood. Not in my back yard ha. Typical !!
No one wants them in their back yard!!! They create mess and the ones that ive come across are not law abiding, they are theives.
It's i before e Make Life. THIEVES.

Never mind though, even my spelin' is a bit off at times.

Your all got miners. Got yours, 'F' everyone else.

I hope that's OK for the NS censors !!

JHopper says...
12:48pm Tue 30 Jun 09

Why do they call themselves "Travellers" when they don't actually want to do any travelling?

Gypo says...
1:05pm Tue 30 Jun 09

They just cannot win. They were no doubt travellers, who wanna put down roots now on an old field. You don't want them in Petts Wood, or New Eltham so let them be where they are.

JHopper says...
1:12pm Tue 30 Jun 09

Gypo, obviously you are biased because, going by your name, you are no stranger to burning tyres and horse markets.

The sad fact of the matter is that gypsies and/or travellers, call them what you will, do often leave the areas they live in much worse than before they move in. You are right, I do not want them living next to me because I pay council tax in order to live where I do, and that's something "Travellers" are averse to. They live a cash-in-hand lifestyle, we all know that.

Gypo says...
1:21pm Tue 30 Jun 09

Cash in hand, you can't beat it bruv. Its like a sore penis, you can't beat it.


JHopper says...
1:29pm Tue 30 Jun 09

Unfortunately, there are some people in our society who prefer to find cash in other people's attics, or at least the lead off our roofs.

JHopper says...
2:26pm Tue 30 Jun 09

The video's just like a reenactment of the film "Snatch". Though not a sign of Brad Pitt in this one.

madras says...
9:15am Wed 1 Jul 09

Gypo - my point was not so much one of locale, but more about the type of land they chose to occupy - in your example of a car park, this is not their land. If they chose to purchase land on which they are allowed to live then fine - but not on someone else's land, or land on which building such homes is expressly forbidden.

Five Arches says...
11:26am Wed 1 Jul 09

Hi
Nice to see the walls,fences,block paving etc is in a better state than the ones they done for cash for the OAPs in my area.


VIDEO - SOLE STREET: Traveller families evicted VIDEO - SOLE STREET: Traveller families evicted

Most popular






When news happens – email newsdesk, call 01689 885703 or text keyword NEWS SHOPPER along with your news, pictures and videos to 80360.

Top stories for Bexley, Bromley, Lewisham and Greenwich and Dartford and Gravesend, and elsewhere in south east London and north Kent.

Local Information

Enter your postcode, town or place name

House prices »   Schools »   Crime »   Hospitals »

Local Businesses