News RSS Feed


Top stories for Bexley, Bromley, Lewisham and Greenwich and Dartford and Gravesend, and elsewhere in south east London and north Kent.
Register now to post your comments. It’s free, quick and easy. £20 prize paid for best comment.
Sign up for News Shopper's free email bulletins and text alerts.
Email your photos and videos or text keyword NEWS SHOPPER with your message/photo/video to 80360.

Residents against congestion charge

11:20am Monday 12th November 2007

comment Comments (4)   Have your say »


IMPROVING public transport rather than congestion charging is the solution to traffic problems in a town centre, according to residents.

Surveys commissioned by Transport for London (TfL) reveal overwhelming opposition to the introduction of such a congestion charge scheme in Greenwich.

The documents, seen by News Shopper, were obtained by the Association of British Drivers (ABD) under the Freedom of Information Act.

One study, titled Greenwich Feasibility Study, was published last month and says: "Opposition to a congestion charge scheme in Greenwich was much higher than for the central London scheme with 77 per cent opposed and only 16 per cent in favour."

A survey by research company Ipsos MORI, published in January, said people were positive about public transport in the area.

However, it also states: "A majority of respondents think the most effective means of reducing congestion would be to improve public transport in and around Greenwich town centre."

It adds: "Overall, it appears there would be considerable opposition to the introduction of congestion charging to Greenwich town centre."

Greenwich Council, which asked TfL to help it look at solutions to the problem of its clogged-up roads, has denied there are any proposals to implement a congestion charge in the borough.

However, the surveys show a road pricing scheme, similar to the one in central London, is one of several options being explored.

Roger Lawson, the London region co-ordinator for the ABD, which has been campaigning against the idea, said: "They haven't realised the strength of opposition to these plans. They are trying to backpedal."

A TfL spokesman said no decisions have yet been made.

He said: "If any proposals are developed they will be subject to full public consultation and would take into account views of the community."

The Greenwich Feasibilty Study was compiled by Accent, which issued questionnaires and carried out 235 interviews.

It looked at a range of options including different rates, zone sizes, times and days of the week.

The survey found three-quarters of people who live in Greenwich thought traffic congestion was a problem.

A council spokesman said: "The papers we have received from TfL are currently being assessed by council officers.

"The council will make a further statement once it has had a chance to analyse the information."


Your Say YourNews Shopper

James Mason, swr-uk.com, Lewisham, SE London says...
3:47pm Tue 13 Nov 07

NO TAX ON TRAVEL IN GREENWICH - NO TOLL TAX HERE

We see Greenwich Council + TfL under Mayor Ken trying to pretend they don't intend to go ahead and impose their unwanted plans after they
get past the elections next May.

Congestion charging in Greenwich is totally unnecessary and inappropriate. The central London scheme is a straight-forward tax on travel. It
is not related to any congestion caused, and has not reduced congestion.

Travel in Greenwich should be improved by making the road network operate more efficiently, by removing bottlenecks and improving traffic
signals.

This scheme would be a monstrous imposition on travellers in the area, and could well be the kiss of death to the town centre.

It is time people woke up.

VOTE KEN OUT DAY is May 1st 2008.

DO LONDON A FAVOUR - MAKE LIVINGSTONE HISTORY
http://getkenout.net


/

Bryan, London says...
11:40am Wed 14 Nov 07

All I see with this news article is opposition to congestion charging in Greenwich. How about some solutions?

If you don't want congestion charging, what is your solution to the gridlock in Greenwich town centre? I tyhink the Association of British Drivers have highjacked this to promote their "motorists should be able to do what they please and hang the consequences" attitude.

t, woolwich says...
1:17pm Wed 14 Nov 07

Bryan wrote:
All I see with this news article is opposition to congestion charging in Greenwich. How about some solutions? If you don't want congestion charging, what is your solution to the gridlock in Greenwich town centre? I tyhink the Association of British Drivers have highjacked this to promote their "motorists should be able to do what they please and hang the consequences" attitude.
Bryan I think you'll find the gridlock has been engineered by greenwich council in order to for them to have a reason to introduce this money-making scheme.

Firstly they get rid of nearly all parking spaces at the dome, then they close the tidal flow system at the blackwall tunnel on false pretenses. The result is a jam of epic proportions every day.

Its already been proved that greenwich was in cahoots with tfl about this even though they denied it.

So I would suggest that to find a positive solution to this, you would have to start by replacing a corrupt, moneygrabbing council.

shane marden, lancaster says...
11:13am Mon 26 Nov 07

quote
this is ****

Comments are closed on this article.

When news happens – email newsdesk, call 01689 885703 or text keyword NEWS SHOPPER along with your news, pictures and videos to 80360.

Local Advertisers


Local Information

Enter your postcode, town or place name

House prices »   Schools »   Crime »   Hospitals »