Bromley police uncover huge cannabis factory in Beckenham drugs bust

Around 400 plants were found

Around 400 plants were found

First published in News
Last updated
News Shopper: Photograph of the Author by , reporter

A huge cannabis factory was uncovered at a flat in Beckenham on Friday morning (March 21).

Bromley police carried out a search warrant at 8.30am that saw around 400 plants seized from a first floor flat on the high street.

Officers discovered four rooms at the property, situated above a commercial premises, had been converted to run the operation, with equipment involved in cannabis cultivation also found at the scene.

No arrests have been made to date and enquiries continue.

Comments (28)

Please log in to enable comment sorting

11:38am Fri 21 Mar 14

kentlad says...

well done lads great find!
well done lads great find! kentlad
  • Score: 555

11:46am Fri 21 Mar 14

SidcupResident says...

kentlad wrote:
well done lads great find!
Agreed. Many pf the Cannabis smokers/addicts that troll on these message boards in support of Cannabis, don't seem to be bothered by the fact they'll require medication and counselling in years to come to treat their paranoia, schizophrenia and other related ailments.
[quote][p][bold]kentlad[/bold] wrote: well done lads great find![/p][/quote]Agreed. Many pf the Cannabis smokers/addicts that troll on these message boards in support of Cannabis, don't seem to be bothered by the fact they'll require medication and counselling in years to come to treat their paranoia, schizophrenia and other related ailments. SidcupResident
  • Score: 120

12:18pm Fri 21 Mar 14

ripnetuk says...

I personally would rather our police spend their time combating real crimes, like burglars and violent drunks and people who drink drive, rather than targeting people who choose to inhale a mostly harmless plant. (when compared to say alcohol or tobacco).

This bust must have cost a fortune, and taken a number of officers off the streets.

Its about time we admitted that the war on drugs is over, and we lost.
I personally would rather our police spend their time combating real crimes, like burglars and violent drunks and people who drink drive, rather than targeting people who choose to inhale a mostly harmless plant. (when compared to say alcohol or tobacco). This bust must have cost a fortune, and taken a number of officers off the streets. Its about time we admitted that the war on drugs is over, and we lost. ripnetuk
  • Score: -3525

2:12pm Fri 21 Mar 14

white rabbit9 says...

Why don't the police sell the drugs an stop taking the tax payers money.
Why don't the police sell the drugs an stop taking the tax payers money. white rabbit9
  • Score: -360

2:14pm Fri 21 Mar 14

white rabbit9 says...

The best plant to rid the world of cancer.
The best plant to rid the world of cancer. white rabbit9
  • Score: -1334

2:42pm Fri 21 Mar 14

TooHonest says...

ripnetuk wrote:
I personally would rather our police spend their time combating real crimes, like burglars and violent drunks and people who drink drive, rather than targeting people who choose to inhale a mostly harmless plant. (when compared to say alcohol or tobacco).

This bust must have cost a fortune, and taken a number of officers off the streets.

Its about time we admitted that the war on drugs is over, and we lost.
Police officers are spending an increasing amount of their time on paperwork that needs combating to start with, We live in a day and age where technology makes life easier and saves time.

As a smoker, My personal opinion is that the police is doing a very well job by combating cannabis factories, Majority of cannabis consumers are the very same people who turn to burglary to support habits, The ones who mix cannabis with alcohol is most often the ones who can't handle it and gets violent just because he or she is paranoid thinking your looking at them. TROUBLE start's (waste of police time)...

As for drink driving! I think everyone will agree smoking drugs and driving is far worse. Overall the police is reducing crime by spending time on cannabis factories, but of course there will never be a world with no criminals.
[quote][p][bold]ripnetuk[/bold] wrote: I personally would rather our police spend their time combating real crimes, like burglars and violent drunks and people who drink drive, rather than targeting people who choose to inhale a mostly harmless plant. (when compared to say alcohol or tobacco). This bust must have cost a fortune, and taken a number of officers off the streets. Its about time we admitted that the war on drugs is over, and we lost.[/p][/quote]Police officers are spending an increasing amount of their time on paperwork that needs combating to start with, We live in a day and age where technology makes life easier and saves time. As a smoker, My personal opinion is that the police is doing a very well job by combating cannabis factories, Majority of cannabis consumers are the very same people who turn to burglary to support habits, The ones who mix cannabis with alcohol is most often the ones who can't handle it and gets violent just because he or she is paranoid thinking your looking at them. TROUBLE start's (waste of police time)... As for drink driving! I think everyone will agree smoking drugs and driving is far worse. Overall the police is reducing crime by spending time on cannabis factories, but of course there will never be a world with no criminals. TooHonest
  • Score: 75

4:08pm Fri 21 Mar 14

ripnetuk says...

TooHonest wrote:
ripnetuk wrote:
I personally would rather our police spend their time combating real crimes, like burglars and violent drunks and people who drink drive, rather than targeting people who choose to inhale a mostly harmless plant. (when compared to say alcohol or tobacco).

This bust must have cost a fortune, and taken a number of officers off the streets.

Its about time we admitted that the war on drugs is over, and we lost.
Police officers are spending an increasing amount of their time on paperwork that needs combating to start with, We live in a day and age where technology makes life easier and saves time.

As a smoker, My personal opinion is that the police is doing a very well job by combating cannabis factories, Majority of cannabis consumers are the very same people who turn to burglary to support habits, The ones who mix cannabis with alcohol is most often the ones who can't handle it and gets violent just because he or she is paranoid thinking your looking at them. TROUBLE start's (waste of police time)...

As for drink driving! I think everyone will agree smoking drugs and driving is far worse. Overall the police is reducing crime by spending time on cannabis factories, but of course there will never be a world with no criminals.
Do you have links to back up your "facts" ??? ive never read anywhere that the majority of consumers are committing burglary to support their habbit. Its certainly never been the case in the users ive met. Also ive never seen any stats saying that cannabis use is a major factor in drunken disorder. Please do share your links.

I agree about the paperwork - that is also well known to be silly. I guess its the price we pay for having an accountable police force in the post-Stephen Laurence era ??? maybe helmet-cams is the answer so the police are always recorded, and dont have to waste ages writing it up. Helmet cams have the fringe benefit that it reduces claims for police violence as well.
[quote][p][bold]TooHonest[/bold] wrote: [quote][p][bold]ripnetuk[/bold] wrote: I personally would rather our police spend their time combating real crimes, like burglars and violent drunks and people who drink drive, rather than targeting people who choose to inhale a mostly harmless plant. (when compared to say alcohol or tobacco). This bust must have cost a fortune, and taken a number of officers off the streets. Its about time we admitted that the war on drugs is over, and we lost.[/p][/quote]Police officers are spending an increasing amount of their time on paperwork that needs combating to start with, We live in a day and age where technology makes life easier and saves time. As a smoker, My personal opinion is that the police is doing a very well job by combating cannabis factories, Majority of cannabis consumers are the very same people who turn to burglary to support habits, The ones who mix cannabis with alcohol is most often the ones who can't handle it and gets violent just because he or she is paranoid thinking your looking at them. TROUBLE start's (waste of police time)... As for drink driving! I think everyone will agree smoking drugs and driving is far worse. Overall the police is reducing crime by spending time on cannabis factories, but of course there will never be a world with no criminals.[/p][/quote]Do you have links to back up your "facts" ??? ive never read anywhere that the majority of consumers are committing burglary to support their habbit. Its certainly never been the case in the users ive met. Also ive never seen any stats saying that cannabis use is a major factor in drunken disorder. Please do share your links. I agree about the paperwork - that is also well known to be silly. I guess its the price we pay for having an accountable police force in the post-Stephen Laurence era ??? maybe helmet-cams is the answer so the police are always recorded, and dont have to waste ages writing it up. Helmet cams have the fringe benefit that it reduces claims for police violence as well. ripnetuk
  • Score: -30

6:37pm Fri 21 Mar 14

rojo174 says...

white rabbit9 wrote:
Why don't the police sell the drugs an stop taking the tax payers money.
What makes you think that they don't!!!!!!!
[quote][p][bold]white rabbit9[/bold] wrote: Why don't the police sell the drugs an stop taking the tax payers money.[/p][/quote]What makes you think that they don't!!!!!!! rojo174
  • Score: -20

6:51pm Fri 21 Mar 14

white rabbit9 says...

rojo174 wrote:
white rabbit9 wrote:
Why don't the police sell the drugs an stop taking the tax payers money.
What makes you think that they don't!!!!!!!
lol it's called the CIA. I bet if you followed the trail that it would lead to someone in a high place running the show.
[quote][p][bold]rojo174[/bold] wrote: [quote][p][bold]white rabbit9[/bold] wrote: Why don't the police sell the drugs an stop taking the tax payers money.[/p][/quote]What makes you think that they don't!!!!!!![/p][/quote]lol it's called the CIA. I bet if you followed the trail that it would lead to someone in a high place running the show. white rabbit9
  • Score: -900

7:20pm Fri 21 Mar 14

ripnetuk says...

white rabbit9 wrote:
Why don't the police sell the drugs an stop taking the tax payers money.
They do (or at least the state does) in colarado USA. made 3 million dollars in 3 months for community projects like schools etc and noone has gone on a stoned rampage yet ..
[quote][p][bold]white rabbit9[/bold] wrote: Why don't the police sell the drugs an stop taking the tax payers money.[/p][/quote]They do (or at least the state does) in colarado USA. made 3 million dollars in 3 months for community projects like schools etc and noone has gone on a stoned rampage yet .. ripnetuk
  • Score: 3038

10:54pm Fri 21 Mar 14

Gypo.Joe says...

ripnetuk wrote:
white rabbit9 wrote:
Why don't the police sell the drugs an stop taking the tax payers money.
They do (or at least the state does) in colarado USA. made 3 million dollars in 3 months for community projects like schools etc and noone has gone on a stoned rampage yet ..
I recently got back from a skiing trip to Colorado, the sweet smell of weed in Aspen was enough to get you high as a kite. The tax revenue is far higher ripentuk. Other businesses are booming too, especially pizza parlours with everyone with the munchies.

http://www.huffingto
npost.com/2014/03/10
/colorado-marijuana-
tax-revenue_n_493622
3.html
[quote][p][bold]ripnetuk[/bold] wrote: [quote][p][bold]white rabbit9[/bold] wrote: Why don't the police sell the drugs an stop taking the tax payers money.[/p][/quote]They do (or at least the state does) in colarado USA. made 3 million dollars in 3 months for community projects like schools etc and noone has gone on a stoned rampage yet ..[/p][/quote]I recently got back from a skiing trip to Colorado, the sweet smell of weed in Aspen was enough to get you high as a kite. The tax revenue is far higher ripentuk. Other businesses are booming too, especially pizza parlours with everyone with the munchies. http://www.huffingto npost.com/2014/03/10 /colorado-marijuana- tax-revenue_n_493622 3.html Gypo.Joe
  • Score: 170

11:47pm Fri 21 Mar 14

white rabbit9 says...

Detective who stole drugs from police compound and sold them for £1million

Read more: http://www.dailymail
.co.uk/news/article-
2586323/Detective-st
ole-drugs-police-com
pound-sold-1million-
fund-lavish-lifestyl
e-including-buying-O
RANGERY-pays-just-25
0-000.html#ixzz2wdzj
sqj1
Follow us: @MailOnline on Twitter | DailyMail on Facebook
Detective who stole drugs from police compound and sold them for £1million Read more: http://www.dailymail .co.uk/news/article- 2586323/Detective-st ole-drugs-police-com pound-sold-1million- fund-lavish-lifestyl e-including-buying-O RANGERY-pays-just-25 0-000.html#ixzz2wdzj sqj1 Follow us: @MailOnline on Twitter | DailyMail on Facebook white rabbit9
  • Score: -2010

12:21am Sat 22 Mar 14

Gypo.Joe says...

white rabbit9 wrote:
Detective who stole drugs from police compound and sold them for £1million

Read more: http://www.dailymail

.co.uk/news/article-

2586323/Detective-st

ole-drugs-police-com

pound-sold-1million-

fund-lavish-lifestyl

e-including-buying-O

RANGERY-pays-just-25

0-000.html#ixzz2wdzj

sqj1
Follow us: @MailOnline on Twitter | DailyMail on Facebook
Quoting the Daily Mail !!

Oh my sides you are an idiot, ( not that there was ever any doubt ) Do you wear your mothers make up you circus clown.
[quote][p][bold]white rabbit9[/bold] wrote: Detective who stole drugs from police compound and sold them for £1million Read more: http://www.dailymail .co.uk/news/article- 2586323/Detective-st ole-drugs-police-com pound-sold-1million- fund-lavish-lifestyl e-including-buying-O RANGERY-pays-just-25 0-000.html#ixzz2wdzj sqj1 Follow us: @MailOnline on Twitter | DailyMail on Facebook[/p][/quote]Quoting the Daily Mail !! Oh my sides you are an idiot, ( not that there was ever any doubt ) Do you wear your mothers make up you circus clown. Gypo.Joe
  • Score: 175

11:26am Sat 22 Mar 14

white rabbit9 says...

Quoting the Daily Mail !!

Oh my sides you are an idiot, ( not that there was ever any doubt ) Do you wear your mothers make up you circus clown.
--------------------
--------------------


The guardian just never coveres any stories worth reading.
Quoting the Daily Mail !! Oh my sides you are an idiot, ( not that there was ever any doubt ) Do you wear your mothers make up you circus clown. -------------------- -------------------- The guardian just never coveres any stories worth reading. white rabbit9
  • Score: -1000

12:39pm Sat 22 Mar 14

Gypo.Joe says...

white rabbit9 wrote:
Quoting the Daily Mail !!

Oh my sides you are an idiot, ( not that there was ever any doubt ) Do you wear your mothers make up you circus clown.
--------------------

--------------------



The guardian just never coveres any stories worth reading.
Try the Huffington Post then.

Or Reuters even.
[quote][p][bold]white rabbit9[/bold] wrote: Quoting the Daily Mail !! Oh my sides you are an idiot, ( not that there was ever any doubt ) Do you wear your mothers make up you circus clown. -------------------- -------------------- The guardian just never coveres any stories worth reading.[/p][/quote]Try the Huffington Post then. Or Reuters even. Gypo.Joe
  • Score: 5

1:23pm Sat 22 Mar 14

TrueBadBoy says...

Just to show the ignorant the reality of cannabis. Cannabis has 2 main ingredients, the first is THC (tetrahydrocannabino
l), this is a physco active ingredient that can make a few people have a bad reaction in the head, but then so do many other drugs. The 2nd ingredient is the one that makes this drug illegal, it is called CBDs (cannabinoids) ... this ingredient is a miracle ingredient and the Big Pharma corporations spend millions each year lobbying the government to keep this out of the public domain. The reason is that this ingredient cure a multitude of illnesses and cancer would be one of them. If you get some cannabis and put it into a alcoholic solution, mix it and then strain the foliage from the fluid and then heat the fluid in a pan to reduce the alcohol and you are left with oil. This is the ingredient that they actually want you to not know about and the media ONLY talk about the THC ingredient which can be bad. Go work out why you support the government and drugs corporations over the reality of WHY they don't mention that other ingredient and its wonder curing power !
Just to show the ignorant the reality of cannabis. Cannabis has 2 main ingredients, the first is THC (tetrahydrocannabino l), this is a physco active ingredient that can make a few people have a bad reaction in the head, but then so do many other drugs. The 2nd ingredient is the one that makes this drug illegal, it is called CBDs (cannabinoids) ... this ingredient is a miracle ingredient and the Big Pharma corporations spend millions each year lobbying the government to keep this out of the public domain. The reason is that this ingredient cure a multitude of illnesses and cancer would be one of them. If you get some cannabis and put it into a alcoholic solution, mix it and then strain the foliage from the fluid and then heat the fluid in a pan to reduce the alcohol and you are left with oil. This is the ingredient that they actually want you to not know about and the media ONLY talk about the THC ingredient which can be bad. Go work out why you support the government and drugs corporations over the reality of WHY they don't mention that other ingredient and its wonder curing power ! TrueBadBoy
  • Score: -29

1:28pm Sat 22 Mar 14

TrueBadBoy says...

That CBD ingredient works like this : the human cell has receptors, cancer attaches itself to a receptor and damages the cell. CBDs also attack themselves to a receptor and then attack the cancer sitting on its receptor, once it kills the cancer receptor it then re mutates the cell back to a healthy state. This CBD ingredient if exposed and released by the government would cost the Big Pharma corporation over ONE TRILLION dollars a year .... because they sell the drugs and treatments for cancer !
That CBD ingredient works like this : the human cell has receptors, cancer attaches itself to a receptor and damages the cell. CBDs also attack themselves to a receptor and then attack the cancer sitting on its receptor, once it kills the cancer receptor it then re mutates the cell back to a healthy state. This CBD ingredient if exposed and released by the government would cost the Big Pharma corporation over ONE TRILLION dollars a year .... because they sell the drugs and treatments for cancer ! TrueBadBoy
  • Score: -29

1:39pm Sat 22 Mar 14

TrueBadBoy says...

and for the people that ticked the thumbs down .... let me educate you idiots further. The cure for cancer has been in America since 1977, a clinic in Texas uses "antineoplastons" to cure people. The US government has taken this clinic to court no less than 12 times to try and shut it down, on behalf of lobbying by the drugs corporations. The US Supreme court has over ruled the government and allowed this clinic to continue curing people of cancer. The rich go to this clinic and it would also be the very same clinic that UK children have gone to for "treatment in America", you remember the ones in the tabloids that had donations set up so they could get £250,000 for this "treatment in America". Ever heard anything about them again ? Nope !. Before you rubbish what I say, please get you head into a state where you can actually learn something instead of listening to the media and government like good little sheep. Check my facts and see the light of how silly and conditioned you really are !
and for the people that ticked the thumbs down .... let me educate you idiots further. The cure for cancer has been in America since 1977, a clinic in Texas uses "antineoplastons" to cure people. The US government has taken this clinic to court no less than 12 times to try and shut it down, on behalf of lobbying by the drugs corporations. The US Supreme court has over ruled the government and allowed this clinic to continue curing people of cancer. The rich go to this clinic and it would also be the very same clinic that UK children have gone to for "treatment in America", you remember the ones in the tabloids that had donations set up so they could get £250,000 for this "treatment in America". Ever heard anything about them again ? Nope !. Before you rubbish what I say, please get you head into a state where you can actually learn something instead of listening to the media and government like good little sheep. Check my facts and see the light of how silly and conditioned you really are ! TrueBadBoy
  • Score: -28

11:21am Sun 23 Mar 14

Dr Martin says...

kentlad wrote:
well done lads great find!
well said
[quote][p][bold]kentlad[/bold] wrote: well done lads great find![/p][/quote]well said Dr Martin
  • Score: 5

12:09pm Sun 23 Mar 14

ripnetuk says...

TrueBadBoy wrote:
That CBD ingredient works like this : the human cell has receptors, cancer attaches itself to a receptor and damages the cell. CBDs also attack themselves to a receptor and then attack the cancer sitting on its receptor, once it kills the cancer receptor it then re mutates the cell back to a healthy state. This CBD ingredient if exposed and released by the government would cost the Big Pharma corporation over ONE TRILLION dollars a year .... because they sell the drugs and treatments for cancer !
What complete drivel. It can provide symptomatic relief from chemo symptoms but it does not cure cancer. This kind of nonsense doesn't help the cause.
[quote][p][bold]TrueBadBoy[/bold] wrote: That CBD ingredient works like this : the human cell has receptors, cancer attaches itself to a receptor and damages the cell. CBDs also attack themselves to a receptor and then attack the cancer sitting on its receptor, once it kills the cancer receptor it then re mutates the cell back to a healthy state. This CBD ingredient if exposed and released by the government would cost the Big Pharma corporation over ONE TRILLION dollars a year .... because they sell the drugs and treatments for cancer ![/p][/quote]What complete drivel. It can provide symptomatic relief from chemo symptoms but it does not cure cancer. This kind of nonsense doesn't help the cause. ripnetuk
  • Score: 659

12:44pm Sun 23 Mar 14

white rabbit9 says...

Gypo.Joe wrote:
white rabbit9 wrote:
Quoting the Daily Mail !!

Oh my sides you are an idiot, ( not that there was ever any doubt ) Do you wear your mothers make up you circus clown.
--------------------


--------------------




The guardian just never coveres any stories worth reading.
Try the Huffington Post then.

Or Reuters even.
The Huffington Post. At one time a liberal Democrat she later became a popular conservative commentator in the mid-1990s, after which she adopted liberal political beliefs in the late 1990s. She is the former spouse of former Republican congressman Michael Huffington.

http://en.wikipedia.
org/wiki/Arianna_Huf
fington

now I know why you are messed in the head.

Reuters is actually founded by a jew and as the world is run by jewish but which are actually Khazarian I wouldn't trust it as far as I could throw you.

You are completely clueless and have been manipulated by these programmers.........
........it all makes sense now. All newspapers are controlled by the 1% desighed to give you pieces of the puzzle, not the whole picture.
[quote][p][bold]Gypo.Joe[/bold] wrote: [quote][p][bold]white rabbit9[/bold] wrote: Quoting the Daily Mail !! Oh my sides you are an idiot, ( not that there was ever any doubt ) Do you wear your mothers make up you circus clown. -------------------- -------------------- The guardian just never coveres any stories worth reading.[/p][/quote]Try the Huffington Post then. Or Reuters even.[/p][/quote]The Huffington Post. At one time a liberal Democrat[1][2] she later became a popular conservative commentator in the mid-1990s, after which she adopted liberal political beliefs in the late 1990s.[3] She is the former spouse of former Republican congressman Michael Huffington. http://en.wikipedia. org/wiki/Arianna_Huf fington now I know why you are messed in the head. Reuters is actually founded by a jew and as the world is run by jewish but which are actually Khazarian I wouldn't trust it as far as I could throw you. You are completely clueless and have been manipulated by these programmers......... ........it all makes sense now. All newspapers are controlled by the 1% desighed to give you pieces of the puzzle, not the whole picture. white rabbit9
  • Score: -707

8:52am Mon 24 Mar 14

JoeBlobbs says...

white rabbit9 wrote:
Gypo.Joe wrote:
white rabbit9 wrote:
Quoting the Daily Mail !!

Oh my sides you are an idiot, ( not that there was ever any doubt ) Do you wear your mothers make up you circus clown.
--------------------



--------------------





The guardian just never coveres any stories worth reading.
Try the Huffington Post then.

Or Reuters even.
The Huffington Post. At one time a liberal Democrat she later became a popular conservative commentator in the mid-1990s, after which she adopted liberal political beliefs in the late 1990s. She is the former spouse of former Republican congressman Michael Huffington.

http://en.wikipedia.

org/wiki/Arianna_Huf

fington

now I know why you are messed in the head.

Reuters is actually founded by a jew and as the world is run by jewish but which are actually Khazarian I wouldn't trust it as far as I could throw you.

You are completely clueless and have been manipulated by these programmers.........

........it all makes sense now. All newspapers are controlled by the 1% desighed to give you pieces of the puzzle, not the whole picture.
And there we have it, no thread on the NS comments forum is complete without a totally unrelated rant from that pesky rabbit which somehow manages to weave in a mention to Jews, Rothschild's, bankers etc with a contradiction thrown in.

For the record, and back to the topic....I hope this country looks at how it's working/not working regarding legalisation/decrimi
nalisation/medical use from the countries that have made the leap over. If case studies can show a shift in the laws on cannabis are worthwhile then surely we should follow suit. Personally I enjoyed a bit in me younger days and it didn't stop me having a productive life. When I have a meetings in Amsterdam i'll nip into a coffee shop afterwards for a smoke in a safe legal environment before I return to London and must say I still quite enjoy it the couple of times a year im there.
[quote][p][bold]white rabbit9[/bold] wrote: [quote][p][bold]Gypo.Joe[/bold] wrote: [quote][p][bold]white rabbit9[/bold] wrote: Quoting the Daily Mail !! Oh my sides you are an idiot, ( not that there was ever any doubt ) Do you wear your mothers make up you circus clown. -------------------- -------------------- The guardian just never coveres any stories worth reading.[/p][/quote]Try the Huffington Post then. Or Reuters even.[/p][/quote]The Huffington Post. At one time a liberal Democrat[1][2] she later became a popular conservative commentator in the mid-1990s, after which she adopted liberal political beliefs in the late 1990s.[3] She is the former spouse of former Republican congressman Michael Huffington. http://en.wikipedia. org/wiki/Arianna_Huf fington now I know why you are messed in the head. Reuters is actually founded by a jew and as the world is run by jewish but which are actually Khazarian I wouldn't trust it as far as I could throw you. You are completely clueless and have been manipulated by these programmers......... ........it all makes sense now. All newspapers are controlled by the 1% desighed to give you pieces of the puzzle, not the whole picture.[/p][/quote]And there we have it, no thread on the NS comments forum is complete without a totally unrelated rant from that pesky rabbit which somehow manages to weave in a mention to Jews, Rothschild's, bankers etc with a contradiction thrown in. For the record, and back to the topic....I hope this country looks at how it's working/not working regarding legalisation/decrimi nalisation/medical use from the countries that have made the leap over. If case studies can show a shift in the laws on cannabis are worthwhile then surely we should follow suit. Personally I enjoyed a bit in me younger days and it didn't stop me having a productive life. When I have a meetings in Amsterdam i'll nip into a coffee shop afterwards for a smoke in a safe legal environment before I return to London and must say I still quite enjoy it the couple of times a year im there. JoeBlobbs
  • Score: 100

8:49pm Mon 24 Mar 14

reasonable75 says...

Gypo.Joe wrote:
ripnetuk wrote:
white rabbit9 wrote:
Why don't the police sell the drugs an stop taking the tax payers money.
They do (or at least the state does) in colarado USA. made 3 million dollars in 3 months for community projects like schools etc and noone has gone on a stoned rampage yet ..
I recently got back from a skiing trip to Colorado, the sweet smell of weed in Aspen was enough to get you high as a kite. The tax revenue is far higher ripentuk. Other businesses are booming too, especially pizza parlours with everyone with the munchies.

http://www.huffingto

npost.com/2014/03/10

/colorado-marijuana-

tax-revenue_n_493622

3.html
How come Joe has a lot of thumbs up?
[quote][p][bold]Gypo.Joe[/bold] wrote: [quote][p][bold]ripnetuk[/bold] wrote: [quote][p][bold]white rabbit9[/bold] wrote: Why don't the police sell the drugs an stop taking the tax payers money.[/p][/quote]They do (or at least the state does) in colarado USA. made 3 million dollars in 3 months for community projects like schools etc and noone has gone on a stoned rampage yet ..[/p][/quote]I recently got back from a skiing trip to Colorado, the sweet smell of weed in Aspen was enough to get you high as a kite. The tax revenue is far higher ripentuk. Other businesses are booming too, especially pizza parlours with everyone with the munchies. http://www.huffingto npost.com/2014/03/10 /colorado-marijuana- tax-revenue_n_493622 3.html[/p][/quote]How come Joe has a lot of thumbs up? reasonable75
  • Score: 30

9:53pm Mon 24 Mar 14

Gypo.Joe says...

reasonable75 wrote:
Gypo.Joe wrote:
ripnetuk wrote:
white rabbit9 wrote:
Why don't the police sell the drugs an stop taking the tax payers money.
They do (or at least the state does) in colarado USA. made 3 million dollars in 3 months for community projects like schools etc and noone has gone on a stoned rampage yet ..
I recently got back from a skiing trip to Colorado, the sweet smell of weed in Aspen was enough to get you high as a kite. The tax revenue is far higher ripentuk. Other businesses are booming too, especially pizza parlours with everyone with the munchies.

http://www.huffingto


npost.com/2014/03/10


/colorado-marijuana-


tax-revenue_n_493622


3.html
How come Joe has a lot of thumbs up?
Just call me Mr Popular.


Oi veh WR9 you really are anti Semitic aren't you, did your circumcision go bad ?

Didn't get an invite to a Bar Mitzvah ?

What is it ?
[quote][p][bold]reasonable75[/bold] wrote: [quote][p][bold]Gypo.Joe[/bold] wrote: [quote][p][bold]ripnetuk[/bold] wrote: [quote][p][bold]white rabbit9[/bold] wrote: Why don't the police sell the drugs an stop taking the tax payers money.[/p][/quote]They do (or at least the state does) in colarado USA. made 3 million dollars in 3 months for community projects like schools etc and noone has gone on a stoned rampage yet ..[/p][/quote]I recently got back from a skiing trip to Colorado, the sweet smell of weed in Aspen was enough to get you high as a kite. The tax revenue is far higher ripentuk. Other businesses are booming too, especially pizza parlours with everyone with the munchies. http://www.huffingto npost.com/2014/03/10 /colorado-marijuana- tax-revenue_n_493622 3.html[/p][/quote]How come Joe has a lot of thumbs up?[/p][/quote]Just call me Mr Popular. Oi veh WR9 you really are anti Semitic aren't you, did your circumcision go bad ? Didn't get an invite to a Bar Mitzvah ? What is it ? Gypo.Joe
  • Score: 375

9:55pm Mon 24 Mar 14

ripnetuk says...

oi this is a "should we criminalise hippies" debate not a let's be racist fest. Please stay ot
oi this is a "should we criminalise hippies" debate not a let's be racist fest. Please stay ot ripnetuk
  • Score: 695

2:00am Wed 26 Mar 14

Stop_Whining says...

Have hugs, not drugs.
Have hugs, not drugs. Stop_Whining
  • Score: 150

1:17pm Sun 30 Mar 14

seach of justice says...

so police find a load of plants that cant kill you and the armchair specialist sit behind their computer screens and spout drivel about the "dangers"of cannabis whilst no doubt sipping on a cafeine based drink or possibly a glass of vino with their cigerette!!,,probly oblivious to the fact that you have far more lethal plants growing in yr own back garden!!...a crime needs a victim,no?....i see no victim/victims here
so police find a load of plants that cant kill you and the armchair specialist sit behind their computer screens and spout drivel about the "dangers"of cannabis whilst no doubt sipping on a cafeine based drink or possibly a glass of vino with their cigerette!!,,probly oblivious to the fact that you have far more lethal plants growing in yr own back garden!!...a crime needs a victim,no?....i see no victim/victims here seach of justice
  • Score: -14

3:44am Mon 31 Mar 14

Stop_Whining says...

Stop_Whining wrote:
Have hugs, not drugs.
Thanks for the votes folks.

Dont get high, or you will die.

Praise, dont blaze.
[quote][p][bold]Stop_Whining[/bold] wrote: Have hugs, not drugs.[/p][/quote]Thanks for the votes folks. Dont get high, or you will die. Praise, dont blaze. Stop_Whining
  • Score: 59

Comments are closed on this article.

Send us your news, pictures and videos

Most read stories

Local Info

Enter your postcode, town or place name

About cookies

We want you to enjoy your visit to our website. That's why we use cookies to enhance your experience. By staying on our website you agree to our use of cookies. Find out more about the cookies we use.

I agree