Bexley named worst in the country for food hygiene

News Shopper: Bexley is the worst in the country for food hygiene Bexley is the worst in the country for food hygiene

BEXLEY has been named and shamed by a consumer watchdog as the worst-performing local authority for ensuring local restaurants and takeaways comply with hygiene rules.

A Which? investigation into 395 local authorities using data submitted to the Food Standards Agency (FSA) found Bexley was the worst with more than 80 per cent of businesses rated for risk.

The figures showed no hygiene sampling at all was carried out by Bexley.

Local authority rankings were based upon criteria such as the number of premises compliant with hygiene requirements, the number of visits performed by council inspectors and the percentage of premises yet to receive a risk rating.

Which? executive director, Richard Lloyd, said: "No one wants another horsemeat fiasco, so it is very worrying that local authority food checks are in decline.

"We want to see a more strategic approach to food law enforcement that makes the best use of limited resources and responds effectively to the huge challenges facing the food supply chain."

But the council has hit back at the survey's results and claims they are inaccurate and out-of-date.

A council spokesman said: "We are disgusted that 'Which?' are claiming that the London Borough of Bexley is 'struggling to ensure that their local businesses comply with hygiene rules' and that no official food sampling has been carried out in Bexley.

"When the Food Safety Hygiene rating scheme started in Bexley in April 1, 2012 we took the decision to focus our resources on rating higher risk food premises, such as takeaways and fast food premises to protect residents. These are the sorts of establishments we thought could be in danger of a low rating and which might need a spur to improve.

"The latest figures are showing an improvement in overall ratings as we bring more premises into the scheme."

The council said official food sampling was carried in 2012/13 and 47 samples were taken.

"We take our food safety role extremely seriously in Bexley, but would state that it is ultimately the businesses themselves who are responsible for complying with food safety law."

Comments (6)

Please log in to enable comment sorting

9:46am Wed 15 Jan 14

highway warrior says...

The figures came out in May last year, whats to say that the inspectors are just very picky and apply the criteria more strictly than their counter parts else where in the country.
The figures came out in May last year, whats to say that the inspectors are just very picky and apply the criteria more strictly than their counter parts else where in the country. highway warrior
  • Score: -5

10:15am Wed 15 Jan 14

derekhope says...

If the council don't have the clout to close down premises that have poor hygiene, the least they could do would be to pass a law locally that food establishments must display their ratings on the front door.
But better still, close down any with a low rating, don't let them reopen until they clean up and come into line, charge for the reinspection and keep them closed until all is satisfactory and charge every time a reinspection was called for.
The scandal of dirty eating establishments and takeaways should end NOW. Bexley residents deserve nothing less.
If the council don't have the clout to close down premises that have poor hygiene, the least they could do would be to pass a law locally that food establishments must display their ratings on the front door. But better still, close down any with a low rating, don't let them reopen until they clean up and come into line, charge for the reinspection and keep them closed until all is satisfactory and charge every time a reinspection was called for. The scandal of dirty eating establishments and takeaways should end NOW. Bexley residents deserve nothing less. derekhope
  • Score: 11

11:17am Wed 15 Jan 14

R_U_Serious says...

Totally misleading headline! Is hygiene really that bad or just the council's ability to check it???
Totally misleading headline! Is hygiene really that bad or just the council's ability to check it??? R_U_Serious
  • Score: 1

1:30am Thu 16 Jan 14

ISaidThis says...

"The council said official food sampling was carried in 2012/13 and 47 samples were taken."

A whole 47 samples in two years? WOW! That's amazing Bexley Council. No wonder you pay your executives so much money.
"The council said official food sampling was carried in 2012/13 and 47 samples were taken." A whole 47 samples in two years? WOW! That's amazing Bexley Council. No wonder you pay your executives so much money. ISaidThis
  • Score: 7

4:03pm Thu 16 Jan 14

HearTheFacts says...

Where is Gareth Bacon now?, maybe his sampling the eggs.

I'm sure we need his lies.

Remember Bexley Council is BONKERS!
Where is Gareth Bacon now?, maybe his sampling the eggs. I'm sure we need his lies. Remember Bexley Council is BONKERS! HearTheFacts
  • Score: 1

1:48pm Sat 18 Jan 14

Teaspoon says...

BEXLEY IS NOT A COUNTRY! doh!

So that must mean Bexley in Kent in ENGLAND is okay... ha ha
BEXLEY IS NOT A COUNTRY! doh! So that must mean Bexley in Kent in ENGLAND is okay... ha ha Teaspoon
  • Score: 0

Comments are closed on this article.

click2find

About cookies

We want you to enjoy your visit to our website. That's why we use cookies to enhance your experience. By staying on our website you agree to our use of cookies. Find out more about the cookies we use.

I agree