- Mobile site
- E-Newsletters
-
- News feed
- Find us on Twitter
@NewsShopper
All the latest news and views from News Shopper
- Find us on Facebook
News Shopper
Like us on Facebook
Police 'would not report colleague' (From News Shopper)
Get involved: Send pictures, video, news and views - text NEWS SHOPPER to 80360 or email us
Police 'would not report colleague'
4:35pm Monday 14th January 2013 in News © Press Association and news reporter
Police 'would not report colleague'
ONLY half of police officers would report a colleague for beating up a suspect for attempting to escape arrest, a study into police ethics has revealed.
Just 54 per cent of officers said they would definitely report a colleague who "punched a suspect a couple of times as a punishment for fleeing and resisting", found the Open University survey.
Some 4.2 per cent of officers - nearly one in 20 - said they would "definitely not" report such behaviour, while 6.5 per cent said they would "maybe not" report it, 21.2 per cent said they would "maybe" report it and 13.1 per cent remained neutral.
After presenting officers with 11 such scenarios, the report concluded that officers were not willing to report colleagues' actions even when they were certain that behaviours were against the rules. In her report, Dr Louise Westmarland, senior lecturer in criminology at the Open University, said the findings showed the "blue wall of silence still exists".
Presenting the survey at a conference on leadership and standards in the police service, "The study found officers were unlikely to report officers even in cases they thought were serious."
Elsewhere, one in five or 19 per cent of officers said they would definitely not report a colleague who runs a private security business, while nearly one in five or 17.3 per cent would "definitely not" report an officer who accepted unsolicited gifts on duty. The survey also found that one in four officers would definitely not report an officer who accepted food and alcohol on occasions such as Christmas.
Dr Westmarland said the study also found that overall officers seemed "uncertain" as to what was "against the rules".
In the report, she said: "The findings of the study reveal that officers seem uncertain of the rules and regulations covering their behaviour, especially at the lower end of the spectrum. In other words, officers were not clear about the bending of rules covering minor offences such as working in their spare time or accepting free drinks or small gifts."
Officers who had been on the force for five years or less would report colleagues less often than expected, the report said, while officers who had been on the force 15 years or more would report the behaviour more often than expected.
The survey received responses from 520 police officers at three unidentified police forces, including a large force with major cities and mixed rural areas, a large metropolitan force with significant, largely isolated rural areas and a small rural force.
Comments(10)
Inspirationalady28
says...
9:30pm Mon 14 Jan 13
j.j.
says...
7:59am Tue 15 Jan 13
the wall
says...
10:57am Tue 15 Jan 13
Inspirationalady28 wrote:David Cameron has no right to question the Police on ethics. Cameron has the ethics of a leech.
It's just like David Cameron said; “Police ethics and practicing needs questioning.” I personally think the police will always try to save their own bacon!!
How many more Police hating comment are you going to post?
goldenbroomboy
says...
12:02pm Tue 15 Jan 13
j.j. wrote:So its ok for police to break the law & get away with it? That's what happened in Ceacescu's regime.
This might be true,but not necessarily always a bad thing. I think this partly reflects the solidarity between members of the force and partly their frustration with laws and regulations that protect criminals more than they protect victims or the police. It's also good for criminals to know that they will not always be handled with silk gloves.
Here in the seventies it was a standard joke that young men would often be charged with criminal damage to police property by continually smashing their heads against a truncheon.
PaulErith
says...
1:16pm Tue 15 Jan 13
Familyguy321
says...
5:21pm Wed 16 Jan 13
i dont doubt the results but dont try to taint the police service as a whole when only 520 were quizzed. 520 does not represent a "blue wall of silence", and i dont defend anyone who behaves that way. but can any of you honestly state that if you saw your friend commit a crime you would report them to police ?? i think not
reasonable75
says...
5:58pm Thu 17 Jan 13
Inspirationalady28 wrote:What have the police done to you? Every time you comment it's criticising the police
It's just like David Cameron said; “Police ethics and practicing needs questioning.” I personally think the police will always try to save their own bacon!!
And why haven't you answered the question raised on the other article?
You're quick to demand comments that are at odds with yours get remove, quick to demand people are banned, yet lethargic in answering questions
Marty1979
says...
9:59pm Thu 17 Jan 13
Maybe inspirationalady will be reporting the incident, demanding the officer concerned is sacked and given a custodial prison sentence
Oldchap
says...
10:04am Sat 19 Jan 13
ChristsMuso1965 wrote:Why didn't you try other methods - I'm sure some of the papers would have taken up your case?
This explains why I never received any justice when I was beaten by six police officers. they beat me because I refused for them to handcuff me although I was not under arrest and they did not give me a reason why they wanted to handcuff me. Yet when I made my complaint, both the first investigation and the IPCC reports went on lies that the police told. And now I know why. They would rather cover each other than the truth be told.
Or contact your MP?
ChristsMuso1965 says...
9:06pm Mon 14 Jan 13