Poll: Strong Bexley and Bromley backing for Met water cannon plans

News Shopper: Water cannon in action during the Egyptian revolution in January 2011 (pic by Muhammad Ghafari). Water cannon in action during the Egyptian revolution in January 2011 (pic by Muhammad Ghafari).

Plans for the Met to have water cannon have found some of their most enthusiastic supporters in Bexley and Bromley, according to a public consultation.

The results of the poll were released on Wednesday as Mayor of London Boris Johnson wrote to Home Secretary Teresa May to voice his backing.

Eighty per cent of respondents from Bexley and Bromley, the highest proportion of all the groups polled, agreed with the statement there was a “gap in the police toolkit which water cannon could fill” in the event of serious public disorder.

But there have been no incidents in either borough in the last five years which would have met the threshold for using water cannon – even during the riots in August 2011.

Seventy-eight per cent of Bromley and Bexley respondents agreed there was a “small, limited role” for water cannon – second only to Havering and Redbridge on 84 per cent.

Erith and Thamesmead MP Teresa Pearce questioned Mr Johnson's backing for water cannon.

She said: "I think that we need to be funding more police officers not a water cannon.

"The Mayor has ignored the responses to his own consultation on this as well as ignoring the detailed assessment published by the London Assembly.

"To be purchasing a water cannon is an unnecessary expense at a time when Safer Neighbourhood Teams are underfunded."

Mr Johnson’s letter to the Home Secretary said: “No one wants to see water cannon deployed routinely on the streets of London.

“It should only ever be used in response to the most extreme cases of public disorder.”

But the Mayor added: “Throughout our consultation in London my team and I and the senior police officers involved have stressed that this tool, if and when licensed, will be ‘rarely seen and rarely used’.”

The final decision now rests with Mrs May. The online consultation polled 4,200 Londoners aged 16 or over between February 18 and March 3.

 

Comments (5)

Please log in to enable comment sorting

3:17pm Fri 21 Mar 14

goldenbroomboy says...

Probably the residents of Farnborough Park worried about the great unwashed marching along the A21.
Probably the residents of Farnborough Park worried about the great unwashed marching along the A21. goldenbroomboy
  • Score: 2

3:21pm Fri 21 Mar 14

white rabbit9 says...

Control the people, control the way they think, the system has to protect itself.
Control the people, control the way they think, the system has to protect itself. white rabbit9
  • Score: 11

1:00pm Sat 22 Mar 14

TrueBadBoy says...

Shows the mentality of the people in said area. No trouble in 5 years and they want to inflict a cost to the taxpayer. These will probably be rich people in big houses scared to death of whatever they hear on the media !
Its draconian to want a weapon like this ... the police have tazers and guns and cs gas and batons and handcuffs, the normal everyday man would just have his fists .... logic is a funny word but stupidity through conditioned fear is just weak !
Shows the mentality of the people in said area. No trouble in 5 years and they want to inflict a cost to the taxpayer. These will probably be rich people in big houses scared to death of whatever they hear on the media ! Its draconian to want a weapon like this ... the police have tazers and guns and cs gas and batons and handcuffs, the normal everyday man would just have his fists .... logic is a funny word but stupidity through conditioned fear is just weak ! TrueBadBoy
  • Score: 5

1:26pm Sat 22 Mar 14

Gypo.Joe says...

goldenbroomboy wrote:
Probably the residents of Farnborough Park worried about the great unwashed marching along the A21.
Not at all.

In James Purdy I trust.
[quote][p][bold]goldenbroomboy[/bold] wrote: Probably the residents of Farnborough Park worried about the great unwashed marching along the A21.[/p][/quote]Not at all. In James Purdy I trust. Gypo.Joe
  • Score: -35

2:13pm Sun 23 Mar 14

Hyper-Deactive says...

TrueBadBoy wrote:
Shows the mentality of the people in said area. No trouble in 5 years and they want to inflict a cost to the taxpayer. These will probably be rich people in big houses scared to death of whatever they hear on the media !
Its draconian to want a weapon like this ... the police have tazers and guns and cs gas and batons and handcuffs, the normal everyday man would just have his fists .... logic is a funny word but stupidity through conditioned fear is just weak !
"the police have tazers and guns and cs gas and batons and handcuffs"

Didn't see them being used much in the last lot of riots.
[quote][p][bold]TrueBadBoy[/bold] wrote: Shows the mentality of the people in said area. No trouble in 5 years and they want to inflict a cost to the taxpayer. These will probably be rich people in big houses scared to death of whatever they hear on the media ! Its draconian to want a weapon like this ... the police have tazers and guns and cs gas and batons and handcuffs, the normal everyday man would just have his fists .... logic is a funny word but stupidity through conditioned fear is just weak ![/p][/quote]"the police have tazers and guns and cs gas and batons and handcuffs" Didn't see them being used much in the last lot of riots. Hyper-Deactive
  • Score: 0

Comments are closed on this article.

click2find

About cookies

We want you to enjoy your visit to our website. That's why we use cookies to enhance your experience. By staying on our website you agree to our use of cookies. Find out more about the cookies we use.

I agree